Hey, my name is Caua. I'm from Brazil and want to practice my English. Can anyone help? ^ Hope that helps.

She withdrew the whole complaint would be the same as: She withdrew the complaint. If you were going to say, "She withdrew the all complaints." The sentence would be wrong. You would say it as so: "She withdrew all the complaints." She withdrew all the complaints and She withdrew the whole complaint are 2 different sentences. The first points to 1 entire complaint being withdrawn; whereas, the Second sentence points to multiple complaints being withdrawn.

That sentence literally makes no sense. -27 year old native English speaker

Forgotten, would be the correct word in this sentence.

Could you please help correct some mistakes, if any, in my essay? Thanks a lot!

Topic: With the development of AI, will intelligent machines make our brain regress?
Could you please help correct some awkward uses or incorrect expressions in my essay? Thanks!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In recent years artificial intelligence has been advancing at a breathless pace, a trend that has triggered debate about the implications it may have. As it continues to grow, so does unease about its might. Perhaps one of the most decisive issues related to this fast-growing technology is the impact on human brains. Decribed as problematic and corrosive by some, however, it is also defended by others as essential for human progress.

It is true that AI has made a dramatic difference to human life and enhanced human endeavor by complementing what humans understand but struggle to handle. One notable example is deep learning, a system that can teach computers to perform tasks from pattern recognition to translation, even better than its human counterparts. But it is equally true that this capacity is narrow and specific despite how competent and advanced machines are. Take Microsoft’s real-time translation; Tones of voice, cultural references, idioms, and humor have proved a stumbling block to the accuracy when it comes to the nature of languages understood by humans only. Moreover, machines do not yet have anything approaching the wide, fluid ability to infer, judge and decide that is inextricably linked with intelligence in the conventional human sense. Consider, for instance, the rise of self-driving cars. A car that drives itself better than its owner sounds like a boon; a car with its own ideas about where to go, less so. 

(I don't understand what you are trying to say with this sentence.)

Overall, although the benefits of the AI boom, such as machine learning and algorithms capable of understanding languages or recognizing images abound, claims that technology will spell the end of human brains are premature. Rather, far from replacing human minds, it is instead a tool that helps them keep up with surging demand for more important types of thinking to survive and thrive.

I would change the above sentence to read as follows:

Overall, the benefits of the AI boom recognize images abound, the claims that technology will spell the end of the human brains are premature. However, they are far from replacing human minds. They are tools that help keep up with surging demand for more important types of thinking to survive and thrive.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks again!

Anything in red or green I would personally remove.