I didn’t even know there were quotas! 😯

Mine is to get better in my Spanish 🇪🇸!!

I think it's likely there was an error with the YouTube subtitles. In this context, 'shed' doesn't mean anything. I think it's more likely he said 'S h i t!'

Something finally made sense to the speaker. A 'eureka' moment.

It would be more correct to say: * There are two colours available. * It's available in two colours. * We have it in two colours. 'hear' is the common way to reply, whether it's in texts, emails, letters or any other form of communication.

Both are ok and natural. They are just in the different tenses. The first in Past Simple, the second Past Perfect. While Past Simple is just that, simple, and is the first of the past tenses taught to people, the Past Perfect is natural for anyone who has a higher level. Hope that helps! 😊

I agree with the book. The 'fell' is referring to one specific event that began and ended in the past, so the past simple is appropriate here. This is also the case for 'went'. The past perfect, 'had been falling' could be correct if what came after it was different than what is there. For example, "... the government`s net worth had been falling for a much longer period of time."

them