Search from various English teachers...
Profile
Hey, I'm Shane. I am currently a university student and phone repair guy living in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. I've been speaking German for a couple of years but I kind of let my speaking ability slip a little bit recently. I also started learning Japanese last summer, and I'm taking the introductory classes this semester. I'm mostly looking for a Japanese language partner at the moment, but my Japanese skills aren't the best yet. If you want to improve your English and don't mind my Japanese ability then we'll get along fine!
Learning
Japanese
German
Language Skills
EnglishNative
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
 Last monthLast 3 monthsAll time
Completed lessons000
Attendance rate100%100%100%
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
  • Answered
    They all look fine to me, great work!
    0 voted
    July 11, 2018
    0
  • Commented

    Basically, it refers to  a serious crime like murder that was not planned. Instead, someone commits the crime based on a quick, irrational decision rather than planning it out. For example, say a husband catches his wife sleeping with someone else, he may not think properly and do something violent towards one or both of them, before thinking about what they have done and the possible consequences. Any sort of violent crime in situations like this can be called a "crime of passion", as long as no planning was done.


    Can be used as a defense in court against murder charges, for example, since murder requires planning and intent (also called premeditation).

    0 voted
    July 5, 2018
    0
  • Answered
    It's more like 'everything that is possible for us to get, we have'. As in, there's nothing more to be gained because they have everything already. 'Everything that we are to have' is talking about something in the future, that there is something more out there to get. I read it a bit closer, and it does seem that you're correct after all with your sentence. Sorry, I didn't realise that it was also referring to the future. They essentially mean the same thing here.
    0 voted
    February 8, 2018
    1
  • Answered
    They seem to mean the same thing to me, but 'What are you doing but this?' sounds a bit strange to me. You can still use it and people would understand you though. Can also use 'What are you doing besides this?'
    0 voted
    February 8, 2018
    0
  • Corrected

    There to be

    Hi, there

    What "Germany is too big for there to be an easy balance-of-power in Europe but too small to dominate the continent" mean? Too big for THERE TO BE"? What is "there" referring to?

    Thank you


    Hi,

    'there' in this case is used as what is called an 'expletive', it is basically a placeholder for a noun that goes with a verb (in this case, an infinitive 'to be'). When you look at sentences like:

    'It is time to go',

    'It is true that I cry after watching that movie',

    and 'It is a shame that I didn't see her last night',

    'it' is also an expletive, because there's no obvious subject to go with the verb 'is'. Instead, you substitute it with 'it' as a placeholder.


    Looking at other examples using 'there':

    'There is a man behind the wall',

    'There was a fly in my soup',

    and 'There is no way that will happen',

    There doesn't refer to a location, but is just a placeholder for the verb 'is', as every verb needs a subject to refer back to.


    If you said 'Germany is too big for to be an easy balance-of-power in Europe, but too small to dominate the continent', there would be no subject that refers back to 'to be' in the new clause. So we substitute 'there' in this case as an expletive.


    Hopefully my answer made sense, I haven't talked about expletives in a while. 


    Thanks,

    Shane

    0 voted
    February 8, 2018
    0
  • Corrected

    [154 Questions of Siem Reap 1.]

    Would you mind correcting my essay? If you were me, how would
    you go about writing it?
    Which part should I describe in detail? I hope my explanations are clear. I hope you can understand this.


    I had several questions from a person who thoughtfully corrected my previous post about the Angkor Wat. I’ll answer to him for my best.


    (1) How many buildings were there? 

    (A) There are were a lot of buildings. If you want to see those them, you need to have a seven-day-pass and an efficiently seeing around efficient sightseeing plan.

    (2) How big were the buildings? 

    (A) I don’t know exactly, but once I cribbed a building on the top climbed to the top of one, it seemed to looked like on the 7or8 floors it had 7 or 8 floors (maybe "it was 7 or 8 stories/storeys (American vs. British spelling) tall"). It was a nice view.

    (3) Did they have interior rooms? 

    (A) yes, they did. I saw some interior rooms carved such as which had beautiful pictures carved into them.

    (4)What were the buildings used for in ancient times? 

    (A) I think that the most of them were madden stones.  Not sure what this means, the question means more like "what was the purpose of these buildings?"

    (5)What kind of historical artifacts were there? 

    (A)there were plenty of Khmer empires artifacts in the national museum. Better said as "There were plenty of artifacts of the Khmer empire in the national museum"


    Besides these small things, that was very well done, nice job.

    0 voted
    February 7, 2018
    1
  • Posted
    Using に for regular intervals Was wondering about the differences between these two sentences: メアリーさんは土曜日に学校を行きません。 メアリーさんは土曜日学校を行きません。 I read that you don't use に when describing something that is a regular interval, so to translate "Mary does not go to school on Saturdays", would I use the second one (without に)?
    February 6, 2018
    2
    0