Search from various English teachers...
Profile
Learning
Japanese
Korean
Language Skills
EnglishNative
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
 Last monthLast 3 monthsAll time
Completed lessons000
Attendance rate100%100%100%
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
  • Answered
    I think you should say: "Would you have left it at home?"
    0 voted
    December 11, 2017
    1
  • Corrected

    Technical advancement only harms nature.

    Science has changed our lives significantly. Although technical advancement has a lot of advantages, some people think it has brought some serious environmental problems.

    Personally, I think that technical advancement mostly harms the Earth. First of all, the production of cars has resulted in global warming. The greenhouse effect is warming the planet and threatening the environment. Additionally, factories are one of the causes of air pollution. Moreover, technical advancement has provided people with comfortable living conditions, thus causing overpopulation which is disastrous for the Earth. Greater populations have polluted and consumed more, ruining the environment and intensifying a variety of problems.

    However, some fail to recognize the harm of technical advancement. In their opinion, it is much more beneficial than dangerous. For example, solar panels are very popular in the 21st century. They, unlike thermal power stations, can generate energy without harmful emissions.

    There is a great deal of truth in what they say. Unfortunately, manufacturers often try saving by using cheap equipment, which severely harms the environment.

    All in all, environmental problems are becoming more and more pressing. I still strongly believe that technical advancement is dangerous, not only for flora and fauna, but also for all human beings themselves. As a result of technical achievements, the planets ability to support people is becoming endangered.

    0 voted
    December 11, 2017
    2