IELTS 9 Writing Task 2：If several languages die out Q：Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion？ A： In this global village, people tend to learn a global language in order to communicate with people from different countries, thus, some local languages face a endangered problem. It is supposed to be acceptable for some people who think life will be easier but I disagree this statement. Languages do not only symbolize civilizations but also cultures and history of different nations. Those disappear, which means that we might lose some characteristic cultures. People born in the following generations will not have a chance to understand the historical literature and resources. The human society will not improve if we do not comprehend our history. All kinds of knowledge such as technology, economic and social science consist of interactions between every individual and the differences of value and cultures. Some pure feelings only exist in a specific language. For instance, Chinese poetry implies a fruitful and classical meanings about family and emotions that western people will never know. In other words, this cannot be replaced or replicated by any other languages. On the other hand, life will not be easier if there are only few languages in the world. Since the world is immense, some differences in using languages are still derives from distinct areas. People still need to learn another languages. In addition to acquiring knowledge from different cultures, we could also find pleasure in learning other languages. We could compare them and think in different way. (Thanks for helping me~~ ^_^)

IELTS 9 Writing Task 2：Improve public health Q：Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. A： In recent years, the notion of health has gradually become important. The issue of improving public health is also discussed by people. The question is whether increasing the number of sports facilities could achieve this goal or other methods should be considered. There is no doubt in my mind, doing daily exercise is good for health. If governments construct more facilities to promulgate doing exercise, it will be more convenient for citizens. For instance, a community sport centre might be built and gymnasiums, parks and swimming pools also located nearby their houses. They will not have excuses to be lazy to go exercising. Moreover, they could save the time in taking transport. However, doing exercise is not the only way to improve and keep one's fitness. Some people still get sick although they do a lot of sports. The reason is they have a bad living custom, such as staying up late or eating fast food. Doing exercise will not make them better. There are more elderly and sick people living in the world. The medical improvement, therefore, is significant as well. Another reason is that people are so busy in modern society. They are multitasking and they always forget the importance of their health. Governments should hold some activities to remind them and encourage them to do exercising at the free time. In my opinion, increasing the number of sports facilities is necessary but not the best way to improve public health. To be healthy involves healthy diets, normal life, sufficient sleep and daily exercise. As a result, I think governments should consider all kinds of methodologies in order to construct a better living environment. (Thanks for helping me ^_^)