Search from various English teachers...
Profile
Learning
Other
Dutch
French
Language Skills
SpanishNative
EnglishNative
German
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
 Last monthLast 3 monthsAll time
Completed lessons0060
Attendance rate100%100%97%
Teacher reviews
Julia Visscher
Dutch
Dec 21, 2018
Het ging goed, het is duidelijk dat je je best doet en oefent. Super!
Jannette Fenijn
Dutch
Dec 14, 2018
You did your homework so well! And you told me fluently about the red panda story. Today, we went over the Separable verbs. You could separate them well!
Arjan
Dutch
Dec 10, 2018
Sam has significantly improved his Dutch in the last couple of months. We had entertaining conversations about several topics:)! Good job Sam!
Activities
  • Answered
    Hello, I don't understand what you mean by academically, as the choice of words varies greatly depending on the academic field that you are working on. For example, if you study science and math the word choice will be different from that of a law student. However, I have changed them to sound less wordy. 1. The competition faced by U.S. growers from imports of fresh vegetables has intensified. 2. Many urban areas lack enough land to build new public schools. 3. Allergic reactions to local dental anesthesia rarely happen. 4. The doors on these ferries were enlarged to facilitate loading and unloading vehicles.
    0 voted
    January 27, 2019
    1
  • Answered
    Hello Patrick, Here is the difference. A product is a noun, it means an article or item that has been manufactured or produced for sale or as a result of a natural, chemical or other manufacturing processes. For example, food products or waste products. On the other hand, production is also a noun but it means the act itself or the process itself of manufacturing a product. For example, food production. However, please notice how production may have multiple meanings depending on the context. Here you can see some examples: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/production Please let me know if you have questions!
    0 voted
    January 27, 2019
    1
  • Answered
    Hey Hiro, The noun dent has no relation to the noun dentist. The fact that the word "dent" is found in the word "dentist" is purely coincidental. When it comes to healthcare most professions have specific nouns to describe them, for example, some people may say "the eye doctor" but is actually an Ophthalmologist or an optometrist. When it comes to veterinarians, calling them animal doctors is grammatically correct as they are technically exactly that. However, they are not medical doctors per se. They have a title, that is a veterinarian. Recognizing people's jobs and titles is often polite and shows respect. With some professions, you will just have to memorize the official titles. Let me know if you need more help!
    0 voted
    January 24, 2019
    0
  • Answered
    Hey, This is quite an advanced text for English learners. However, let me explain. Within this context, the word "contingent" means dependent or conditional. By doing some research I found out that the book talks about masculinity and the caring character of men compared to those of women. According to the text, women have a more caring nature regardless of their situation. On the other hand, the caring nature of men is dependable on many factors like family, friendships, jobs, etc. In other words, we can say that the caring nature of men is contingent on their background. In this example, I'm using the word "nature" instead of character. The word character in this context means the mental and moral qualities distinctive of someone. So when we talk about "character of care" we talk about the caring qualities of men or their caring nature. Now, when we say the "contingent character" of care, we are saying that the character of care, or caring nature, is dependable or conditioned by something else. In this case, the character of care of men is contingent on their background and situation. Let me know if you need further explanation!
    0 voted
    January 24, 2019
    0
  • Answered
    Hey, grammatically it is all correct. They also look formal but depending on what you need it for I would specify the type of degree, such as a bachelor in science, or a master of international relations.
    0 voted
    January 24, 2019
    0
  • Answered
    Hello Niwantha, First I will correct then i will explain. "I have set a few simple targets for myself and I am so looking forward to working on achieving them." OR "I have set a few simple targets for myself and I am so looking forward to working on achieving them." First, i got rid of "to working towards" because it was unnecessary and makes the sentence more complicated than needs to be. You already wrote that you were looking forward to something, so saying" looking forward to working towards" is redundant and repetitive. Using forward as an adverb already implies that is toward a place or time beyond. Second, achieving and working are gerunds (verb+ing), and here they are used as a nouns. It is answering the question what?, What are you looking forward to? I look forward to working on achieving goals OR i'm looking forward to working on achieving goals. You do not need the "in" after the verb "achieving", you achieve goals or you look forward to achieving goals, you do not "look forward in achieving goals". I hope it helped! Let me know if you need me to further explain
    0 voted
    January 1, 2019
    3
  • Answered
    Hey! The difference is very subtle, and both verbs are synonyms of each other, meaning that they have very similar definitions, but here it is: First, to expend means to use up something or to fully consume something. For example, "if you expend all your energy working, you won't be able to do anything else later" or "The energy expended at work could be use for something else". As you can see in both example the verb indicates consumption, in this case of energy. So for the first example, if you use up all your energy at work you won't have any for other activities later. In the second example, the energy used at work could be used somewhere else. On the other hand, to spend is a verb that relates more to the expenditure of money or time. For example, "I spend my free time at the beach" or "I like to spend money shopping". Just like expend it means to use up something, but in this case it relates more specifically to time and money. They are very interchangeable, they are synonyms of each other and are used to explain each other. So the difference is minimal, however, the biggest difference is that when we use Spend we are likely talking about time or money. Please let me know if that helped or if you need further help!
    0 voted
    January 1, 2019
    0
  • Answered
    Hello Bean, I am guessing this is a fragment taken from a larger sentence because it seems incomplete. it So the subject here will be "Everyone", here, however, we are missing a verb after 'everyone', for example "Everyone is paranoid..." . The predicate will be everything after the subject, so assuming we add the missing verb the predicate will be "is paranoid that people..." here there is not object, there is an adjective which is the word "Paranoid". The word paranoid could also mean "scared" to make it easier to understand, and it is describing the subject "everyone". So everyone (subject) is (verb) paranoid (adjective). The second part of the sentence starts with "That", that makes it a "that-clause". As you can see the second part is an explanation to the first part, so why are they paranoid? or why will they be paranoid? BECAUSE people will or may be making judgements about them. So the "that-clause" provides an explanation to the matrix clause (or main clause which is "Everyone paranoid that"). Please let me know if that helped and if you need further explanation.
    0 voted
    January 1, 2019
    3
  • Answered
    Hello, Here ‘sprinkling’ is being used as a verb. ‘Sprinkled in’ means that an amount of something (generally a small amount) has been added. This expression is commonly used in cooking, such as ‘Sprinkle in some salt’. In this case the thing that was added to the character’s life was ‘family transitions’ which can also mean family changes. So by saying ‘sprinkled in’ the author is introducing us to a few of the key changes in the character’s family that came after the dead of her husband’s friend. Please let me know if you nees further explanation!
    0 voted
    January 1, 2019
    1
  • Answered
    Hey taylor, Your examples are correct! The difference between acordarse and recordar is very subtle and it is easy to use them wrong. It seems that you have a good understanding of them but here is a quick explanation i gave a student of mine about it. Recordar needs a direct object, we would say ‘recordar algo, to remember something. For example, ‘Que recuerdas de ese dia?’ What do you remember from that day. ‘Recuerdo que era un dia oscuro’, I remember that it was a dark day’. As you can see there is a direct object, which is the thing that you remember. Whereas acordarse is what we call a prenominal verbs, meaning that we need to have a reflexive pronoun (me, te, se, etc). So following up with the same example, ‘Te acuerdas de ese dia?’ Do you remember that day?. ‘Si, me acuerdo de ese dia’ Yes, i remember that day. As you can see we used the reflexive pronouns ‘te’ and ‘me’ and also the proposition ‘de’. So directly translated (which you shouldn’t do!) is more of ‘remembering of something’. In my example, ‘te acuerdas de ese dia?’ , it means do you remember of that day. Almost like the direct object is already given to us. Another example, ‘te acuerdas de la cancion?’ Do you remember the song? It may be a little confusing but I am happy to further explain! In English we only have one remember so spliting into 2 can be challenging but possible!
    0 voted
    January 1, 2019
    0