I think yes. Well, the plural form of these nouns is the same as their singular form, so why should possesive case forms be any different? I guess it complies with the same grammar rules as other nouns. Let's make up an example: Three cinemas and two theatres were built in 1998. The latter's names are 'The Great Theatre of Whatever' and 'The Royal Theatre'.

It means that the real subject of the argument may be different from the one that he got first or one that was seemed to be from the first sight. It's like when people argue about some unimportant things not because of that thing itself but due to some deeper problems they have.

Hello. I'd say that the sentence you are asking about only explains the reason why he wanted to buy them - to get some sugar from donuts and to get some caffeine from Red Bull that would help him to manage his way to Rapid City. Given no further context it is hard to say whether he bought them or not after all, but if nothing that could break his intention to buy the products had happened, he pretty much bought them.

Hi there! 1. It is just the right preposition that you should use with "become" if you're interested in what has happened to somebody or something. -- What has become of her? She is so rude to me today. -- Nevermind, the team she bet on lost yesterday. 2. In this case, the right prep is "into" since Mike was trying to persuade them to sell their car. "talk somebody into doing something / to do something" -- a phrasal verb that means "to persuade somebody to do or not to do something"