| Last month | Last 3 months | All time | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed lessons | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Attendance rate | 100% | 100% | 100% |
- The thing that looks like a 3 is a fast way to write "and", similar to an ampersand, which for some reason I can't type on italki but you can see here: http://ampersanddistilling.com/images/Ampersand.png. So the idea is that someone took food from the work refrigerator, said they didn't do it, but wrote that they ate this food on a social media site that anyone could look at. XOXO means hugs and kisses. In the context, I think we can assume they're sarcastic :) Regards, Lee0 votedApril 11, 20171
Hi Sofía!
Like is correct in all of these examples, and although it is possible to omit it and have good grammar, the meaning changes.
In all of the above examples, 'like' is used to ask for a general description of something. So, "What was education like in the past?" means "Tell me in general about education in the past."
It's not really possible to change it for another word without changing all of the sentence. "What is [x] like?" is a very common structure in English.
We also use it for people, and the function is a little different. "What is Sofía like?" also asks for a general description, but only of personality. For appearance, we say "What does Sofía look like?"
Responses to these questions might be:
"What was education like in the past?" "Less people had the money for education, so classes had less students, and teachers didn't use marks like 7/10, etc."
"What is Lee like?" "He's a friendly person, but sometimes he is absentminded."
"What does Lee look like?" "He's tall, and he has dark brown hair and brown eyes."
Let me know if you have any other questions!
Best regards,
Lee
0 votedMarch 4, 20170While English doesn't have any one governing body for regulation the way many of the Romance languages do, the instiution that reaches the farthest across the world is probably Cambridge. Their position, which has always seemed reasonable to me, is that any form of native English should be considered acceptable as long as it's used consistently on a word-to-word basis. This would mean that it's fine to write 'mom' and 'colour' in the same text, as long as you don't later use 'mum' and 'color.'
As a private teacher in Spain I unfortunately often have to deal with the aftereffects of well-meaning teachers in primary/secondary schools who have told their students that this or that American spelling is outright wrong. Although there are certain advanced cases where you would want to adhere strictly to one national variant of English, I think making such criticisms is counterproductive unless dealing with very high level students. In the early stages of learning the language, when simply writing a text without major grammatical errors can be quite difficult, the last thing we want is to give learners the discouraging impression that the language is so full of landmines that an alternate spelling constitutes a mistake!
I think you're absolutely right to say there is only one English language in this sense. Discounting various creoles, the regional differences in English are minor compared to some other languages - they certainly pale in comparison to the regional variations you can see in Spanish, for example! So if an advanced student finds themselves in the situation where strict British or American English is required, the adjustments they need to make should be well within their ability. In any other situation, even if you considered this an error it would be difficult to justify making it a priority unless the student had mastered a great many other skills.
0 votedMarch 2, 20170- Hello Shinhye! 'Ruin' is more serious than 'screw with someone.' To screw with someone is an informal phrase that means to create problems for them, or to lie to/joke with them. It's always used in informal situations and the meaning can be negative or neutral. It can be used with objects as well as people, and the meaning is similar. Negative examples: "I'm trying to concentrate on studying, but John keeps screwing with me." (John keeps distracting me.) "Don't screw with the radio, you'll break it." (If you continue touching the radio, you'll break it.) Neutral example: "I didn't mean what I said about your hair, I was just screwing with you." (What I said about your hair was a joke.) Let me know if you have any other questions! Best regards, Lee0 votedFebruary 26, 20171
An 'icebreaker' is a speaking activity for the beginning of class, to help students relax and feel more comfortable speaking in the other language. They are normally ten minutes or less, and there are lots of examples available online.
The important thing is just to focus on speaking and making students comfortable. Icebreakers are not for teaching new language or grammar- they may have one or two words of vocabulary but in general they should be easy and fun!
Best luck to your sister.
Regards,
Lee
0 votedFebruary 26, 20170- Hello Huy! What you have written is possible, but it sounds better as "The impact as a whole would be considerable." We normally use this expression to emphasize the idea 'cumulative' or 'complete.' Your example works, but because the expression modifies a noun, we usually see it immediately after the noun. Examples would be: "It´s always sad to fire employees, but it's necessary for the company as a whole to improve." "Prisons are often dangerous, but they make society as a whole a safer place." If you have any other questions just reply or send me a message! Best regards, Lee0 votedFebruary 21, 20171
- Hello Ann! This is correct English, but because of the age it sounds very extravagant to a modern speaker. The sentence continues, "...my business began to fail." This structure, where the first parts of the sentence use only the gerund (-ing) verb without 'to be,' is correct if the next part of the sentence follows normal conjugation rules. For example: "My clothes dripping from rain and my car sitting beside the road, I was a sad sight." "Seeing none of my friends, and recognizing none of the landmarks around me, I start to think I am completely lost." This structure is pretty old! You probably won't use it personally, but if you are reading classics you will encounter it frequently, so it's good to know. Tell me if you have any questions! Regards, Lee0 votedFebruary 18, 20171
- Hello Slava! 'Weep' and 'cry' are often very similar, but 'weep' is much more connected to sad emotions and situations. You would not typically say 'weep tears of joy.' for example. Since weep has this negative association, 'cry with laughter' is more correct. I would also use 'cry' with frustration or rage. Weep is best used with sadness specifically, not just negative emotions in general. Finally, 'cry' is sometimes used to indicate a shout or yell (for example: " 'Be careful!' he cried." ). You can never use 'weep' for this meaning of 'cry.' Let me know if you have any questions! Regards, Lee0 votedFebruary 12, 20170
