| Last month | Last 3 months | All time | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed lessons | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| Attendance rate | 100% | 100% | 100% |
- Generally in English (at least American English) we would say "I was born in Lithuania on March 25, 1997." The next sentence is a bit confusing and took me twice to understand what you were saying. A way to fix it as it currently is written would be "Lithuana was a post-soviet country that was recovering from Russian captivity at the time." A more clear construction would be "I was born March 25, 1997, in Lithuania, a post-soviet country that was recovering from Russian captivity." All my life, in school and at home, I've heard how Russians tried to destroy our nationality and how many people were hurt by them, but that doesn't matter anymore. "Anyway" to begin a sentence isn't necessarily wrong, but it isn't needed. You can just continue "I grew up ...". "It is a small town but not so small for Lithuania, Kaunas has only 299 601 inhabitants and one of them is me." This is a run-on sentence. Place a period after Lithuania and start the next sentence ""It is a small town but not so small for Lithuania. Kaunas has only 299,601 inhabitants and one of them is me." Or even "It is a small town, although not small by Lithuanian standards, with 299,601 inhabitants including me. " "My family has been a typical middle-class family, we couldn't afford a lot, but we weren't the poorest." This isn't bad but the tenses seem a little strained. Something more clear would be "My family was a typical middle class family. We couldn't afford a lot, but also weren't the poorest." Or to keep using "has been" you could construct it "My family has been a typical middle-class family. We can't always afford a lot, but we aren't the poorest." "Has been" denotes that your family was and still is typical middle-class. In the next sentence saying "we couldn't afford a lot" puts it all in the past. I definitely understand it as a native speaker but it does feel a little weird. Very good though! This is me being nitpicky. Your sentences are very understandable for the most part.0 votedJanuary 7, 20181
- Yes, we use "going to have to go" often. Common examples: "I am going to have to go to the doctor tomorrow." "I'm going to have to go buy a new car battery because mine died." "I'm going to..." is just a statement that you will be going ex., "I am going to the doctor tomorrow". You could have a standing appointment or a routine physical and it has been planned for a long time. "I am going to have to go to the doctor tomorrow" expresses a need to go whether you want to or not (maybe you just sprained your ankle or a nagging cough) and most likely that it isn't pre-planned, although it could be and you might just not want to go so are lamenting that you have to go.0 votedJanuary 7, 20180
I would focus on eliminating as much "fluff" language as possible on a professional profile.
- 8 years DAQ well testing experience with relevant downhole tools.
- Performed over 200 successful different types of tests
- Contributed in various ways, assisting with service quality and safety targets, including starting up and maintaining the PSL
- Recognized by employer with multiple MVP and service quality awards.
2 comments: 1, I'm not sure if "downhole" tools is the correct verbiage. If it is and will be understood by an employer, keep it. If not, just use "relevant tools."
2. I don't know what PSL or DAQ is. You might want to spell those out rather than using abbreviations. If people within your field will surely know, then disregard this advice, but acronyms can be more confusing than just spelling them out (Department of Agricultural Quality well testing) (maintaining the Pretty Soil Laboratory).
0 votedJanuary 6, 20180It depends on what your goal is. If you'd like to come to an English speaking country and communicate with the people, you will need to focus on listening and speaking. If you just want to be able to read news, focus on reading. Writing is probably nearly as necessary as speaking because it helps you express yourself like speaking. And reading is also very closely related to listening and can help supplement your listening skills by visualizing words and phrases.
For me, speaking and listening are the hardest skills. You have to know what you are saying or hearing almost instantly while you are speaking or hearing. With writing and reading, in general, you have time to analyze and understand over a longer period of time what you are writing or reading. But that is just my experience.
0 votedJanuary 6, 20180- 1) Do you say "We are going to have dinner, just me and him" or "Just me and he" or "Just he and I"? Which one is right? Just me and him in this case. If you constructed the sentence differently, it could be different. For instance "He and I will be having dinner together." But your construction would need "me and him". I can't explain it well, just know it from being a native speaker. 2) Are these two sentences odd? I moved out of my old house one year ago last week" "I started working here one month ago last Friday"? They would both be understood easily. A small change that could make it clearer might be "Last week made it one year since I moved out of my old house." "Last Friday made it one month since I've been working here."0 votedDecember 27, 20170
- Generally the only time you would use "had" is if the other person's current status is unknown. Have you two spoken lately would be asked by someone who knows, or believe they know, the status of the other person. A detective who is working on a murder case, or a missing persons case, may use "had you two spoken lately?" if they know the person is no longer living or able to talk. They may, however, use "have" as well. In short, have you two spoken lately would be used where both people are known or believed to still be in contact with each other, whereas had you spoken implies that person isn't able to speak for some reason. It's a good question but I'm finding it somewhat hard to be succinct in an answer. Does that help at all?0 votedDecember 27, 20170
- It appears the author is referring to the play and how many characters he is writing into it as he is writing. Many times the word "fucking" is just used as an emphasis. So with the phrase "the whole fucking human race" - it just means that if the writer keeps going at their current pace of introducing characters, the play will have every human in existence written into it. Generally something like this would be said with emotion. "The whole fucking song is bad." "Every word I say is fucking wrong." or "Every fucking word I say is wrong." "I really want to go to that fucking concert!" or "I really fucking want to go to that concert" or "I really fucking want to go to that fucking concert!"0 votedNovember 16, 20173
