Future Simple or "to"? Hello. Could you tell me why in this sentence uses "to" rather than "will continue"? 1. Both parties expect the contract TO continue for а certain period of time. Thank you.

Legal issue Hi. I have a question about the difference between these two words: convicted and prosecuted? For example: 1) He was prosecuted for fraud. 2) He was convicted of fraud. As I understand, these words mean the person was in the court and the court ruled that he was guilty. Am I right? Thank you.

The difference between two sentences What do you worry about? What are you worried about? Is there any difference? As for me, I don't see any difference in the meaning. Thank you.

What the difference? 1) They must have had a party. 2)They must have been having a party. As I understand it, the meaning is the same - they had a party.Right?

Present PErfect or Present Perfect Continuous? What the difference between this sentences? 1)how long have you been having guitar lessons? 2) how long have you had guitar lessons?

Free Movement of Goods Free Movement of Goods is the core of modern EU, when The European Coal and Steel Community was established in 1958. Exactly the economical principles was founded as the basis of this Community, in particular the principle Free Movement of Goods. Currently this principle is in article 34 TFEU. «Quantitative restrictions on imports and all measures having equivalent effect shall be prohibited between Member States». Of course, we have to understand that every freedom must be restricted to reasonable limits. In EU law – is this is article «The provisions of Articles 34 and 35 shall not preclude prohibitions or restrictions on imports, exports or goods in transit justified on grounds of public morality, public policy or public security; the protection of health and life of humans, animals or plants; the protection of national treasures possessing artistic, historic or archaeological value; or the protection of industrial and commercial property. Such prohibitions or restrictions shall not, however, constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States». In considering this question it is necessary to take into account the fact,that EU – is not whole unity one country, but exactly “community of the independence state”. That is way each country has national law that may run counter to national mandatory provisions. But there are two ways to resolve this issue in context Free Movement of Goods: 1) harmonization of legal norms at the EU level; 2) the principle proposed ECJ - mutual recognition (C-120/78 – Cassis de Dijon). Another important principle in this area, it is a principle of compliance with the mandatory requirements of national legislation. At the same time, you should never forget that any restrictions must correspond to the purpose for which they are taken. Any thoughtless restriction of such a fundamental principle as the freedom of movement of goods in the EU will lead to the destabilization of relations between EU member States, which may ultimately lead to the destruction of the EU model itself.

Management by Objectives and the use of appraisal systems. Management by objects is the process of setting and defining goals in the company, then communicating them to employees to develop methods for achieving the goals. Usually, the main goal (the goal of the entire company) is divided into small goals that employees must achieve. In other words, it is setting goals for the future for the company as a whole and for each employee in particular, for which they are working. It is based on a merit system based on performance. For this system to work effectively, some control is necessary. Because after setting goals, you need to monitor their performance, then evaluate the effectiveness of achieving goals and as a result encourage employees who have coped with the tasks. This is what appraisal systems is for. This is a useful management tool that allows you to get an overview of whether the work is effective or not. But on the other hand, it is necessary not only for the employer, but also for the employee, because it allows him to evaluate the effectiveness of his work, understand what place he occupies in the company, and see his weaknesses. It also helps to identify problems that hinder the achievement of his specific goals in the company, and therefore the company as a whole.

What is “at will employment” and how does it apply? When entering into an employment contract, it may include the "will employment" clause. This item allows the employer to dismiss an employee at any time and for any reason. But the employee has the same right to terminate the employment contract at any time and for any reason. This clause may be contained not only in the employment contract, but also in the documents accompanying the employment contract. There are certain circumstances when an employee cannot be dismissed under the "will employment" clause. These are cases when his dismissal violates the public policy of the state. Examples: 1) Refusing an employer’s request to help him steal some of the company’s product (Refusing to do something illegal) 2) Filing a lawsuit for a sexual harassment claim against a supervisor (Reporting a violation of the law) 3) Joining the military (Partaking in acts that are in the public interest) 4) Filing a claim with the state’s workers’ compensation board (Exercising a statutory right) At "will employment" clause also means that an employer can change the terms of the employment relationship with no notice and no consequences. For example, an employer can alter wages, terminate benefits, or reduce paid time off.