Search from various English teachers...
Profile
Learning
Japanese
Language Skills
EnglishNative
Interests
Tech
History
Art
Food
Science
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
 Last monthLast 3 monthsAll time
Completed lessons001
Attendance rate100%100%100%
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
  • Answered
    If this is a paper that is discussing psychology or neuroscience, a "body schema" has quite a specific meaning which is probably too long for a simple answer here, but it is related to a body's position and configuration. In this context I think it is referring to what someone would consider to be the physical aspects of a person's body, its shape, etc.
    0 voted
    June 1, 2020
    0
  • Answered
    I think what you wrote is fine. You could omit "Now" if you like.
    0 voted
    March 16, 2018
    0
  • Answered
    I think "might have" is more natural than "could have". I imagine either could be used and certainly your meaning would be clear.
    0 voted
    March 16, 2018
    2
  • Answered
    The photograph is not very good quality and appears to contain images of satellites and planets. I would suggest that B is more appropriate because of this. C mentions documents, computer graphics etc, which I don't think the picture depicts, but to be honest, I think it is a rather poor question :) This is one situation where the person asking the question needs to make their question clearer, in my opinion.
    0 voted
    January 23, 2018
    2
  • Answered
    Either can be used, but to me "were" feels more natural. When "were born" is used, "born" is some time in the past and to me there is no real "stress" on this. It is also the simpler of the two. With "had been born", to me it stresses the fact that the child was born prior to their death. I am sure some people with stronger grammar knowledge can explain the exact difference for you.
    0 voted
    January 23, 2018
    1
  • Answered
    When "whether" is used, I would usually say "whether or not". So "whether" implies a contrast, in my mind. So in your example: He asked me whether I smoked or not. He asked me whether or not I smoked. Some people may not use "whether" this way, but I do. When you use "if", it is OK as in your example. I guess someone could say "if I smoked or not", but to me it is less natural. You could not say "if or not".
    0 voted
    May 17, 2017
    0
  • Answered
    There is no real difference except I would say that the first is more natural to me.
    0 voted
    May 17, 2017
    1
  • Answered
    Not at all. It is perfectly OK to use "partner" to describe someone you exchange language with. A "partner" is just someone that you have a relationship with. That may be a working relationship, a romantic relationship, a "I will help you if you help me" relationship etc. When the lady you mention wrote "I am married so not seeking a partner" she wanted to indicate that she was already romantically attached and that she was not looking for a male or female to start a romantic relationship. Personally, I feel that it is a little sad that a woman has to write this on her profile. When someone creates a profile on a language exchange site, it should be safe to assume that their only reason for being here is to learn a language. Being a realist, I guess there are those who won't see it that way.
    0 voted
    May 17, 2017
    1
  • Answered
    "What attracts me" is correct. For example: What attracts me to your suggestion is the idea that we will both profit. The past tense: What attracted me to your suggestion is the idea that we would both profit. In the above example "would" can be replaced with "could".
    0 voted
    May 17, 2017
    3
  • Answered
    The second is correct. The first is almost lyrical - as in it is not something that I would speak, but it is quite poetic in nature.
    0 voted
    November 30, 2016
    0