Which is more important to teach at school, academic subjects or how to discriminate between R and W?
Schools are normally considered as a place where students
can be helped to acquire knowledge and improve
employability. In my opinion, although academic courses
are significant,
it could be hard for a student to achieve success if he or she cannot distinguish
right from wrong.Many
teachers believe that students have to pay more attention to main courses, since these subjects will determine if the students
can further their education in university. Through these courses, students will be able to acquire essential knowledge to construct a firm grounding for university, thus to find a decent job in the future. For example,
if one learns and masters mathematics in high school, he or she will be likely to know how to design and build mathematical models to analyse data , thereby being employed as a financial analyst or an engineer.
(sentence may be too long) In contrast, students would not be able to focus on the main subjects if they spend too much time in learning virtual rules and action regulations.
On the other hand, virtue is as important to teach as academic subjects are. With moral guidelines, students can apply their knowledge candidly and be valuable members of our society. Those who know the importance of honesty would
not sell the company's
confidential information to their competitors. An engineer who
is socially responsible will design flawless products, which can be used by customers safely. It is less possible to achieve success for a man who cannot obey vital rules even
if he or she performed excellently at school.
My personal perspective is that
if students can distinguish the right
from the wrong, they will be able to
possess the characteristics to be
successful in the future. Without these, they would not be possible to get along with their classmates and be respected by their teachers. If
students can not realize these problems, their study and their work in the future
will be inevitably impacted.