Search from various English teachers...
Profile
証明書: JLPT N2合格 私について ——— 名前: サニー 職業: 大学生 学習目標: リスニングと語彙力を上げること 学習形式: テキスト、ボイスメッセージ 学習時間: 午後、夜（アメリカの時間帯） ——— 關於我 ——— 名字：sunny 職業：大學生（本科） 愛好：打遊戲、語言學習 學習目標：提高聽力、詞彙量、粵語口音 學習形式：發訊息、發語音消息 學習偏好：下午、晚上（美國時間） ———
Learning
Japanese
Chinese (Mandarin)
Chinese (Cantonese)
Language Skills
EnglishNative
Korean
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
 Last monthLast 3 monthsAll time
Completed lessons000
Attendance rate100%100%100%
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
  • Commented
    그리고, 제가 쓴 한국어가 틀리면, 수정해주세요! 자연스럽게 수정했으면 하는데요.
    0 voted
    January 6, 2019
    0
  • Commented
    빨리 회답해 주셔서 감사합니다!

    저는 어젯밤 이문법 차이에대해 생각했는데, "머리가 아파서 ...."라는 문장에서 "아/어서"가 더 적절한 이유를 이해하는 것같아요.

    누군가 "난 아파서"를 말하면, 보통 뒷말에서 "집에 가도 될까"라는 말을 할 것을 추측할 수 있지요? Is this why 아/어서 is preferred over 아/어 가지고 in this sentence?

    0 voted
    January 6, 2019
    0
  • Posted
    Difference between「verb」＋아／어 가지고 and 「아/어서」 I understand that the former(가지고) is used more in speech (contracted) compared to the second, but are there any differences in grammar?

    I learned that 「－아／어 가지고」 cannot replace 「아/어서」 if two actions are closely connected, such as

    늦어서 미안해요. (I understsnd the "close relstionship" in this sentence)

    학교에 걸어서 가요. (I understsnd the "coose relationship" in this sentence)

    머리가 아파서 먼저 집에 갈게요. (Why can't you say "머리가 아파가지고 먼저 집에 갈게요" I don't understand why 가지고 cannot be used here, according to my textbook)

    I still don't understand the difference in grammar very well.

    January 6, 2019
    5
    0
  • Answered
    히마 looks like a Korean transliteration of the Japanese 暇(ひま) meaning that you are "free" (have extra time to do something), and 보스트 just lookes like "post"
    0 voted
    January 5, 2019
    2
  • Commented
    我的母語是英文。我在學習普通話跟粵語。我也在學習日文（去年12月我考了日本語能力考試2級）。我很想跟你交流語言。很高興認識你。
    0 voted
    January 5, 2019
    0
  • Commented
    Also, qualifying N3 standards doesn't mean that you'll understand any given explanation given in Japanese. Explanations aimed at N3 learners often have to be broken down and simplified so that they can be understood by N3 standards.
    0 voted
    December 30, 2018
    0
  • Commented
    i don't understand what you mean when you say "don't have to give N1 and N2"
    0 voted
    December 30, 2018
    0
  • Commented
    Genki I + Genki II
    0 voted
    December 30, 2018
    0
  • Commented
    I don't necessarily think that nonbilinguals shouldn't teach their native language. I think it depends on how well their second language students understand the nonbilingual teacher's first language.

    In fact, I think it would be better for the advanced students to learn their new language using their new languages as it allows for 100% immersion. Obviously though, this would be too much to handle for beginning students.

    0 voted
    December 30, 2018
    0
  • Corrected
    0 voted
    December 30, 2018
    0