| Â | Last month | Last 3 months | All time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed lessons | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Attendance rate | 100% | 100% | 100% |
correct the resume, thanks
EDUCATION English, 2009-2012
Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao
EXPERIENCE An English teacher at a language school, Qingdao
Taught English to large classes and small groups.
Organized activities and parties.
Created teamwork and built friendship. November 2012- August 2013
An English teacher at NO.1 Middle School, Qingdao
Designed teaching ways.
Improved their pronunciation.
Advised them to say in English and see English films.
Trained them in a group.
Examined at the end of the month.
Analyzed advantages and disadvantages.
HONORS Voted " most popular teacher", 2014-2015
Won the second prize in the teaching match, July 2015Notes:
Highlight 1- You probably "designed lesson plans"? This involves planning what you will do in each class. (You may have also "developed teaching methods"? This would have more to do with changing how you present the information to the kids, the goal would be to present the information in the way that makes it easiest for kids to learn, and the assumption would be made that you were the first to think of them.)
Highlight 2- What context did the students speak in English? What did they talk about and where? From the information given I would say you "Helped students speak English" or "Taught students to speak English." (If you were actually just telling them that they should speak English, "Encouraged students to speak English" would be may appropriate, but I doubt that that is the case.)
Highlight 3- I think "Instructed students" would sound better here ("taught students" is also okay, but taught is less formal)
Highlight 4- What did you analyze advantages and disadvantages of? This is unclear.
As a side note, is there a reason that you refer to students as "them" or "their" and not "students" or "students'"? Is there any reason you did not state the subject of the sentences? Both of these things are understandable, and could possibly be correct, depending on how you were told to format this. I'm entirely unsure of the formatting myself, it just seemed odd from a language based point of view.
0 votedJuly 10, 20161The unemployment rate rapidly increased in the 70s, then stabilized at around 10% before starting to rise again in early 2000.
Notes: Adverbs typically go before the verb in English, though they can go after the verb sometimes, in this instance putting it in front of the verb felt stronger. (I speak English natively, so I don't really know why, I just know how it feels.) If you say it aloud this way, you should put emphasis on the word rapidly, and say the sentence slightly faster than if you say "increased rapidly."
Also, "early 2000" sounds weird, because it could be mistaken for "the early 2000s" describing the first part of the century, or as "early 2000" describing the first part of the year. I would change this to the month or the season of the year that it changed, so it would be "in the (season) of 2000" or "in (month) of 2000." Your wording was 100% grammatically correct, but to someone who speaks English natively, to two are easily accidentally interchangeable.
I do not understand the second paragraph. Are some of these nouns proper nouns? If so, what do they mean in context? I speak a bit of French, so could you maybe write down what you wanted to say in French, in case there was an error in translation?
0 votedJune 8, 20161- Change "even though its important" to "Even though it has an important" This next one is a common mistake for English speakers. While "because" is often used in informal conversation to start a sentence, it is widely viewed as incorrect to start a sentence with "Because", as it is a conjunction that depends on information found in a previous clause. A sentence with "because" has the effect in the first clause, then "because" and the cause of the effect in the second clause. If you start a sentence with "because," your reader is left wondering what effect was caused by whatever reason you describe. This is relatively easy to fix, by replacing "Because" with "In light of" or changing the order of your clauses in the second sentence to say "Homework became an easy way to make students hate learning, because of its unacceptable amounts and types, instead of a way to develop their skills." Also, I agree with the previous commenter that "has become" fits the situation better and sounds better than "became." Stylistically, "not giving daily homework" sounds better to me that "no daily homework," as the previous statement could be interpreted in a couple of different ways. (It could mean that the second type of homework is the best --they use this phrase in infomercials a lot-- or that the first type of homework presented is superior to the second. I figured that you meant it the second way.) It's a tiny detail and the way you have it is understandable, but it could be clearer.0 votedJune 8, 20160
- Personally, as a native English speaker, I have never used the word "whom" except to look up the difference between who and whom. I have heard my English teachers use it occasionally, but certainly not in all of the situations where it theoretically "should have been" used. In extremely formal writing, as in college/job applications, go ahead and use whom if you want. It will make you sound "smart," but you should be wary of using it in conversation, as it can also make you sound like a snob.0 votedJune 7, 20162
- Does the subject of this sentence have to be students? What context is this in? Also, are you talking about attending the whole of university (as in "going to college") or are you talking specifically about a group of individual classes? (If you mean all of university, the word "classes" is unnecessary and confusing. As for the most impressive alternative to the information given, I would go with "It is apparent to most students that the attendance of university classes is imperative."0 votedJune 7, 20160
