<em>Marcin, if there were no piracy, there would be no Microsoft:)</em>
I'm not sure. The Apple and IPhone phenomenon shows there are always people who are ready to pay more... But I agree - it wouldn't be so popular.
<em>People in most of the world would HAVE to use Linux. And they would use Linux</em>.
I personally use Linux for more than 20years... (I use Windows at work and it's not my choice). I was thinking it will gain more users and tried to encourage people to it. Eventually I stopped talking to people about it. People prefer what they know. I could see only ironic smiles.
<em>People use MS Office because "everyone is using MS Office". We're are discussing here how people may need MS Office because their teacher is using it.</em>
Agree! I was in the same position when my son went to school and we had only Linux at home.
<em>I think that immoral thing is done by you and Petteri. Instead of raisng some practice to the level of moral value you should have thought whether the practice is good BEFORE adopting it.</em>
My idea was that we were happy to use the pirate software years ago, because we could learn from it. Now when we can pay, it's ok to reward software developers with our money. But I think there should be free versions or at least less restrictive laws for poorer countries to help them to develop. So I don't think I said exactly the same what Petteri did. How could I personally not adopt this practice? I try to use free software wherever I can. When I can't find one I have to pay.