Search from various English teachers...
Profile
Hey. I'm Mariana, and I'm 24 years old. Well. Portuguese is my mother tongue, but I study English since I was 6 years old, so I tend to consider myself fluent. And I also teach English to young learners. I started learning Spanish, but my classmates gave up and I couldn't afford private lessons. And I'm not sure why, but I am now learning Russian from those free apps on my iPhone. I love to travel, and I love to learn new languages and cultures.
Learning
Spanish
Russian
Language Skills
PortugueseNative
English
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
 Last monthLast 3 monthsAll time
Completed lessons000
Attendance rate100%100%100%
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
  • Commented
    "I'll be waiting on your coments" or "I will wait for your comments".
    0 voted
    September 15, 2016
    0
  • Posted
    The future progressive tense

    I've been studying a little bit about the future progressive tense here, and I have a simple doubt: why?

    I found five uses of the future progressive. And most of them feel like they could be replaced by another verb tense, wich would express the intention better. Like...

    1. Inevitable future - Everyone will be eating hamburgers.
    Okay, but what is the difference from "everyone will eat hamburgers"?

    2. Future event as a result of a previous plan - The band will be performing on the stage.
    Why not "the band will perform on the stage"?

    3. Guesses of the present - I think they will be having lunch now.
    Isn't it better if you say "i think they are having lunch now"?

    4. Polite questions about plans - Will you be staying with us?
    I think the key here is in the polite part... But saying "will you stay with us?" sounds perfectly fine too. Less polite, I agree, but fine.

    5. Events interrupted on the future - I will be sleeping by the time you arrive.
    This is the only use that I really find perfectly clear. I can't substitute it for anything else, if I want to mantain the meaning.

    What can you tell me? Is this really it? Is the future progressive such a redundt tense as I imagine it?

    September 15, 2016
    1
    0
  • Commented

    Thanks, guys, I see all of your points.

    First, I lived in Australia for a while, and I think I carry a lot of its accent. So I tend to agree with Saikat.

    What Phil said, about the European languages having similar intonations in general, is basically what I feel. It's like when a book is teaching the difference of R and L. Okay, it's important for those who speak languages that don't have this sounds, but... Well, it's redundant when our own language already have this sounds.

    My point, however, was answered by Susan. So, native speakers do this so naturally that they don't realize, and when they listen to something different than this, they know something is wrong, but not exactly what. Right?

    I still don't like this subject (sorry), but you all gave me a different perspective. As a matter of fact, what Alan pointed out, the intonation before comas, is the topic for a next class I'll be giving, and I was unsure on how to approach it. I loved the video Peachey sent, but I think I might use one from an Australian comediant, who exagerates it a lot, so it's easier to see how this really makes a difference. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpBYnL5fAXE)

    Thanks so much, guys, and I sure will come back to ask for help with future classes. :P

    0 voted
    September 12, 2016
    0
  • Commented
    There is an amazing podcast talking about phrasal verbs. It's A Phrasal Verb A Day. It's a tricky name, because he doesn't post daily, but he aims to get 356 phrasal verbs. It's really enriching.
    0 voted
    September 11, 2016
    0
  • Commented

    Going abroad to live in a country on literally the other side of the world without knowing no one or anything, just the language.

    It lasted six months before I came back home crying. But I'm dying to do something like that again, haha.

    0 voted
    September 11, 2016
    0
  • Posted
    Rising and falling intonation

    Hello, guys. I'm an English teacher on an after school course. I'm studying here a content of a more advanced class I have, and it talks a whole lot about rising and falling intonation. I'd like to ask the native speakers if this really noticeable. Like this...

    Do you know where we are going? (rising intonation on the end of a Yes/No questions)
    Who told you that story? (falling intonation on the end of a information question)
    Do you prefer apples (rising intonation of items in a questions), bananas (rising intonation) or papaya (falling intonation on the end of a choice question)?

    I mean... It feels odd to teach that. My students intonate questions quite well, but the book we use highlight about this on every single unit, as if this is the biggest deal on the speaking skill.

    Is it really that important?

    September 11, 2016
    6
    2
  • Corrected
    0 voted
    March 8, 2016
    0
  • Answered
    São sinônimos com diferenças muito sutis. Associando com a língua inglesa, teríamos "need", "have to" e "should". O primeiro é mais pessoal, enquanto o segundo e o terceiro denotam alguma obrigação ou dever.
    0 voted
    March 8, 2016
    1
  • Commented

    Well. As you probably know, "o" and "os" are articles, specifically definive masculine articles (artigos definidos masculinos). In portuguese, we can use articles pretty much anytime.


    You can say "Meu nome é Maria" or "O meu nome é Maria". It means basically the same, and does not have a rule to when to use or not an article (at least, not that I can remember). Usually, people use articles in day to day (unless it's an specific accent, such as speakers from the state Espirito Santo).

    Let me know if you understand.

    Good learning. :)

    0 voted
    March 7, 2016
    0
  • Corrected

    Learning English

    Hi there! I'm brazilian and I've been married for four years. I lived in Ireland last year to studied English. I worked there, so that helps me to talk a lot, but I still there is grammar and Phrasal Verbs issues, Lol, as my school got closed and I needed to learn all by my self. I still want to learn more, and teach in the future who doesn't know English. I love English, I love to talk in English and listening music and series, I think that it's sounds so good and that it is a beautiful leanguage! :)

    Thanks.


    --------

    Marriage significa casamento. O verbo marry é o equivalente ao casar, e frequentemente usado em conjunto com o be. Você usou um tempo verbal bem complexo nessa frase... I have been married é uma voz passiva. A forma estrutural é SUJEITO + HAVE + BEEN + VERBO NO PASSADO PARTICÍPIO.

    There is é melhor para dizer que alguma coisa existe. O have tem um sentido mais de posse.

    Acredito que os outros errinhos foram de digitação. ;)

    0 voted
    March 7, 2016
    0