| Last month | Last 3 months | All time | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed lessons | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Attendance rate | 100% | 100% | 100% |
- The future progressive tense
I've been studying a little bit about the future progressive tense here, and I have a simple doubt: why?
I found five uses of the future progressive. And most of them feel like they could be replaced by another verb tense, wich would express the intention better. Like...
1. Inevitable future - Everyone will be eating hamburgers.
Okay, but what is the difference from "everyone will eat hamburgers"?2. Future event as a result of a previous plan - The band will be performing on the stage.
Why not "the band will perform on the stage"?3. Guesses of the present - I think they will be having lunch now.
Isn't it better if you say "i think they are having lunch now"?4. Polite questions about plans - Will you be staying with us?
I think the key here is in the polite part... But saying "will you stay with us?" sounds perfectly fine too. Less polite, I agree, but fine.5. Events interrupted on the future - I will be sleeping by the time you arrive.
This is the only use that I really find perfectly clear. I can't substitute it for anything else, if I want to mantain the meaning.What can you tell me? Is this really it? Is the future progressive such a redundt tense as I imagine it?
September 15, 201610 Thanks, guys, I see all of your points.
First, I lived in Australia for a while, and I think I carry a lot of its accent. So I tend to agree with Saikat.
What Phil said, about the European languages having similar intonations in general, is basically what I feel. It's like when a book is teaching the difference of R and L. Okay, it's important for those who speak languages that don't have this sounds, but... Well, it's redundant when our own language already have this sounds.
My point, however, was answered by Susan. So, native speakers do this so naturally that they don't realize, and when they listen to something different than this, they know something is wrong, but not exactly what. Right?
I still don't like this subject (sorry), but you all gave me a different perspective. As a matter of fact, what Alan pointed out, the intonation before comas, is the topic for a next class I'll be giving, and I was unsure on how to approach it. I loved the video Peachey sent, but I think I might use one from an Australian comediant, who exagerates it a lot, so it's easier to see how this really makes a difference. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpBYnL5fAXE)
Thanks so much, guys, and I sure will come back to ask for help with future classes. :P
0 votedSeptember 12, 20160- Rising and falling intonation
Hello, guys. I'm an English teacher on an after school course. I'm studying here a content of a more advanced class I have, and it talks a whole lot about rising and falling intonation. I'd like to ask the native speakers if this really noticeable. Like this...
Do you know where we are going? (rising intonation on the end of a Yes/No questions)
Who told you that story? (falling intonation on the end of a information question)
Do you prefer apples (rising intonation of items in a questions), bananas (rising intonation) or papaya (falling intonation on the end of a choice question)?I mean... It feels odd to teach that. My students intonate questions quite well, but the book we use highlight about this on every single unit, as if this is the biggest deal on the speaking skill.
Is it really that important?
September 11, 201662 Well. As you probably know, "o" and "os" are articles, specifically definive masculine articles (artigos definidos masculinos). In portuguese, we can use articles pretty much anytime.
You can say "Meu nome é Maria" or "O meu nome é Maria". It means basically the same, and does not have a rule to when to use or not an article (at least, not that I can remember). Usually, people use articles in day to day (unless it's an specific accent, such as speakers from the state Espirito Santo).Let me know if you understand.
Good learning. :)
0 votedMarch 7, 20160Learning English
Hi there! I'm brazilian and I've been married for four years. I lived in Ireland last year to studied English. I worked there, so that helps me to talk a lot, but I still there is grammar and Phrasal Verbs issues, Lol, as my school got closed and I needed to learn all by my self. I still want to learn more, and teach in the future who doesn't know English. I love English, I love to talk in English and listening music and series, I think that it's sounds so good and that it is a beautiful leanguage! :)
Thanks.
--------Marriage significa casamento. O verbo marry é o equivalente ao casar, e frequentemente usado em conjunto com o be. Você usou um tempo verbal bem complexo nessa frase... I have been married é uma voz passiva. A forma estrutural é SUJEITO + HAVE + BEEN + VERBO NO PASSADO PARTICÍPIO.
There is é melhor para dizer que alguma coisa existe. O have tem um sentido mais de posse.
Acredito que os outros errinhos foram de digitação. ;)
0 votedMarch 7, 20160
