Profile
Hi, everybody.
I was registered at this site for the purpose of my language skills improvement. I am from Russia, but live in Denmark. I would learn English and Danish.
I see the interaction at the site in the following manner: I would like to help with studying Russian those who are ready to help me with an improvement of my English and Danish. I look for native speakers. I have great and very pleasant experience of communication with not native English speakers, but I have to tell honestly I would like to practise with those for whom English/Danish is native.
I think, I speak English at the good level, but unfortunately it is often as lifeless and awkward.
Russian is my native language I can be helpful to you in many issues of the Russian language, for example, spelling, grammar, stylistics and so on.
Learning
English
Danish
German
French
Language Skills
RussianNative
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
| Last month | Last 3 months | All time | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed lessons | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Attendance rate | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
- Okay, I misunderstood. In fact now I live _not_ in Russia. I lived in one of the largest cities in Russia (St.Petersburg). Before marriage I lived with my parents and sister (4 person in a three-room apartment). By the way, when I was a child, we lived in a communal apartment. In St. Petersburg communal apartments are very common in the city centre. Many of my relatives live in small towns or villages. My parents have never had a country house or summer home (dacha = дача). But, for example, my father's parents, who lived in a small town, had a few acres of land and little country house. They lived in a townhouse. When I got married, we had to rent an apartment. I did not want to mix two families (my marriage and parents). First, it is always much better to live independently. Secondly, in this case, the private space would have been appreciably reduced. I don't think it would be good. In my case, it was ok with personal space. When I was a child/teenager/young woman I shared a room with my sister. This was not a problem for me. My parents had a private room (bedroom). In the apartment there was one shared room for all family members (something like saloon or front room where all family gathers or where it is possible to give a party). Plus, the kitchen. Actually, this apartment is not really big. On the other hand, very often people live in much smaller apartments and have serious problems with housing services. When I looked for housing, I saw a plenty of apartments, which were generally small and not so comfortable. The matter is that in Russia there are many houses built during Khrushchev's. It was the ambitious "Scandinavian" project. The idea was to provide housing for one person or two people at most. But actually, these houses still stand and serve (though they are in an awful condition), and people live in these tiny (and not cozy, you know) apartments together with children and relatives.0 votedMay 14, 20150
- In general, the layout of the apartment can be different. There is a concept "serie" of the building, that is a certain architectural plan of the building which considers an external and an interior. Noncentral districts of the city are usually built up with the houses from several series. Thus, people can live in identical houses and apartments. This moment is funny "punned" or played upon in old comedy (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0073179/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Irony_of_Fate). People can buy a flat although it is very expensive, and the price is almost always unfair. However, people still can get state apartment. I will not bore you with legal details, which are too much and optional. One can wait one's turn for ages. There are specifications, taking into account the number of square meters per person. I mentioned this in connection with a question of personal space.0 votedMay 13, 20151
I'll add to the previous commentators. "Я учусь на маркетинге". This is definitely wrong, but is actually a very common short form of the expression. This means "I am studying at the Department of marketing". According to the rules of Russian language, "Я учусь на маркетинге" is not correct. But people really speak so.
0 votedMay 13, 20150- Я разговаривал с другом, но тот меня не слушал. ----->I was talking with a friend, but he didn't listen to me. This is a sentence of the same type as yours. At translation, the context is often lost, and all the phrases may sound the same although they are expressed slightly differently in Russian. тот предмет. тот год/месяц/день -----> that subject. that year/month/day дай мне вон тот зонт. -----> give me that umbrella. (the person points to the object which is over there) возьми тот зонт (а не этот)! -----> take that umbrella (but not this one)! here, the person has a number of items and she/he chooses a specific subject from this row это случилось в тот день (а не в какой-то другой) ----->it happened that day (but not in another) то был тот самый зонт (уже упомянутый). -----> this was the same/that umbrella (already mentioned). это был тот самый день. ----->This was the same/that day. here it is said about something that it has been mentioned earlier. я взял не тот зонт. -----> I took not that umbrella. This means that I have not taken the umbrella, which I needed. I took a different, "not right to me". это был не тот день. -----> It was not that day. for example, you mixed up days. you should have an appointment, you thought it was the day of the meeting, but it turned out that this was not that day. у меня был тот же зонт (что и вчера). ----->I had the same umbrella (as yesterday). в тот же день я и уехал. -----> on the same day I left. It says that the umbrella was one and the same. I have the umbrella, which I had yesterday. This is the same object. Hope this helps you. And doesn't confuse.0 votedMay 13, 20152
- In your case, the word "тот" is pronominal noun, which refers to the previously mentioned male person. Я разговаривал с другом, но тот меня не слушал. At the same time, the word "тот" can act as a pronominal adjective. In that case, it can indicate - the object which is far away in space or in time. тот предмет. тот год/месяц/день - the object which is different from the others. возьми тот зонт (а не этот)! это случилось в тот день (а не в какой-то другой) - the object which is mentioned earlier, already known. это был тот самый зонт (уже упомянутый). это был тот самый день. - the object which is necessary or has to be. я взял не тот зонт. это был не тот день. - the object, which is not another. у меня был тот же зонт (что и вчера). в тот же день я и уехал.0 votedMay 13, 20151
- Danish television, design, Arne Jakobsen Now I have a total mess with time. It happens that I find myself in the middle of the night, watching yet another program on the Danish television. That night I came across a movie about the life of Danish architect Arne Jakobsen. I immediately recalled how in Christmas vacation I saw gift sets of books about design, but they cost too much. Besides, I just don't have a place for new books. Overall, it was an interesting and learning film. There were people who knew him well and worked with him on the design. Although I have not found a deeper analysis and the story of how exactly Jakobsen created his products. But after all it is still hard to put this story in the allotted time. It was very interesting to watch this movie because the design for Danes means definitely a lot. The Danes certainly have succeeded in it. Their understanding and perception of design is probably the most canonical. Things should be not only beautiful, but to serve, be functional and comfortable. Coming back to Arne Jakobsen, I can tell that he is certainly the artist. Though I don't like his "Myren stol". This chair just seems to me not much comfortable. I hope, I will be forgiven for that by my darlings and lovely Danes.
May 12, 201510

00:00
00:00