- Main correction: "very fantastic" - it is not normal to add an adjective to this word. Other words you wouldn't use with an adjective would be "incredible", "terrible". You may be able to use "quite" with them, but "very" seems wrong. Other than that is is grammatically correct. I would try to avoid starting multiple sentences in a row with the same word: "We'd". Finally, you should use the oxford comma. It makes lists much easier to read. The oxford comma comes before the "and". "Tomatoes, potatoes, and lettuce."0 votedSeptember 20, 20182
- Your "image" is how people see you. Your personality, your beliefs, your attitude, your views on topics. Mutt - a dog with parents of different breeds. Mutt - an insult essentially calling someone lesser. If this is from a story, for example, of the Italian mafia, someone of full Italian blood may call someone a "mutt" if they have one Italian parent and one parent of a different heritage.0 votedJune 8, 20180
By definitions standards, they are very similar. That are almost the same words, even.
Traitor is the most common and less formal. You will use this almost always.
Betrayer is more poetic and much more formal; regal, almost.
For example:
John the traitor, is a description and that is all
John the betrayer, is less of a description and more of a title and adds a poetic sound to it indicating something of grandeur. Something that everyone would know the reason for.
Though it doesn’t sound right to directly call someone a betrayer, it isn’t incorrect. In those cases you would usually use the verb to betray (I betrayed the king) or traitor.
Today, it is usually only heard as “the betrayer” in a title
0 votedMarch 30, 20180Your English is quite good. I would assume that you do not seek to remain at the same level and seek detailed corrections. Therefore, I will pick this apart for you.
The Most Uplifting and the Biggest Downer (Capitalize important words in titles)
In this review, (comma) I’m going to compare two films that happened to be rather mind-blowing to me and definitely kept me on the edge of my seat.- ( referring to yourself here is unnecessary because you use "me" later in the sentence. While it isn't incorrect, it sounds awkward to have it there twice.)
The film is so action-packed, that it made me sit glued to the screen. However, it has a lot of sickening scenes and sometimes it is really appalling.- (You needn't use "it" a second time for the same subject in the same sentence. Example: It has an apple and is eating. Two things that are happening without a comparison. If you look at my earlier correction, there is a comma which would require the use of the subject again.)
Unfortunately, the film turns out to be very depressing and leaves little room for hope and this would definitely put me off watching it again.
- (This is either a list that was not separated with a comma or a run-on sentence with so many "and"s. You have two options here: make the description into a comma separated list or split the sentence into two.
1. Unfortunately, the film turns out to be very depressing, and leaves little room for hope, and this would definitely put me off watching it again.
-You would replace the first "and" with a comma. You would, also, remove the word "this" because it has now become a list about the film and "this" would no longer refer to the reasons you listed, but the film now putting you off.
2. Unfortunately, the film turns out to be very depressing and leaves little room for hope. This would definitely put me off watching it again.
- In this option, you replace the second "and" with a period. "This" is now still referring to the reasons you listed as being the reasons why you would be put off from watching the film and needs a new sentence because it is a different object.
“The Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind”, has a way (not incorrect, but a very informal descriptor. "an incredibly" "drastically" "presents quite a different") different atmosphere.It explores the nature of memory and romantic love and would appeal to everyone who loves romantic stories.
- (Nothing is wrong here, but I will explain because I said the earlier sentence had too many "and"s. This sentence uses two ideas "It explores and would appeal". The first idea uses a two item list (ex. I have apples and bananas.) It is entirely correct to use two "and"s in one sentence when one is for a joining items in a list and the other is for joining two ideas.
This story depicts two former lovers: (colon) Joel (Jim Carrey) and Clemetine (Kate Winslet) who, after having spent two years together, (another comma) try to come (In English we "work" or "go" through breakups) through a sickening break-up. When Joel receives a note saying that Clementine has had him erased from her memory, Joel decides to do the same. As a medical crew enters Joel’s brain to hunt down his memories, he realizes, too late, (commas) that he wants to keep them.
0 votedMarch 15, 20181
