When referring to one's own home, one says "I am going home." If one is going to work, "I am going to my office." or "I am going to the office". There isn't a good reason "why" one goes home instead of going to home. "Going home" is a very special case -- an exception to the rule. In almost all other cases, it would be correct to say "I am going to the [house/park/store]" When referring to another person's home (Michael for example), one says "I am going to Michael's house." or "I am going to the home of Michael."

In spoken English they are both equally correct. In most cases of written English, they are both fine as well. In American Enlish, "whether or not" is very common and would sound correct to most people. However, one could argue that the correct sentence would be "whether he likes or whether he does not like". That longer form can be shortened to "whether he likes it or not". This isn't a formal answer, it may just be a regional usage. To my ear, saying "whether he likes it or not" sounds very forceful. "I'm going to tell that person what I think whether they like it or not." "Whether or not they like it" sounds a little bit more gentle. "I'm just curious whether or not you've seen him."

Could you provide more information? Depending how it is used, it could mean totally different things. "Call me manic" could mean that Manic is the name someone wants to be called. Alternately, if somebody recognizes they are saying something out of the ordinary, they might jokingly call attention to it by starting the sentence with "call me [something], but .... Some examples: Call me crazy, but I could swear that clown wants to kill me. Call my vain, but I'm the prettiest person here. Call me naive, but I think everybody in the world is truly good at heart. Call me manic, but I think 8 hours of sleep per night is overrated. Alternately, manic is a state of heightened energy.

I'm sorry but there isn't enough information in the question to give you a correct answer. The "third form" of the verb isn't a standard way of naming any conjugation that I am aware of. Possible correct forms: It can happen It can be happening It could happen It could have happened It could be happening. Incorrect: It can be happened. I hope this is helpful. If you you need more information, please provide an explanation of what you are trying to say or information about what form you are calling the "third".

The doctrine of inspiration is the belief that the Christian god used the authors of the Bible as his tool. This is a complicated question that requires some advanced English skills. If you are up for the challenge, try this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_inspiration

Which "are" correct? 1. Third grade, and the third grade are both correct. However, it usually isn't correct to say "at the school". You could say "... at school", but It usually sounds most natural to just say, "I am in third grade." In the second sentence, "the third grade" and "third grade" are interchangeable. However, depending on usage, it might sound better to say, "to do this/that math question" or "to do math questions". 2. I have twice as much money as you do. or I have twice the money you do. 3. I might say: I've been doing drag for ten years. "Wearing drag" is not incorrect, but if you've been wearing the same drag for 10 years, it is probably dirty by now. 4. I went on a hunger strike. These are very interesting sentences. I hope these answers are helpful. Please feel free to ask more questions. Sometimes a sentence sounds correct in a different context. "We're all born naked and the rest is drag." -RuPaul

Hey there, I think "have arrived before" sounds awkward and isn't as correct as saying "already arrived". If you want to use "before", then it sounds best to say "They arrived before us/them/whatever." As soon as you use the word "before", it confines the time when the action occurred, so it makes more sense to use the simple past instead of the past perfect. Depending on the context, I might use either of the following: They have already arrived. or They arrived before something/someone.

It sounds like it was a joke. "What is there to talk about?" sometimes means that there is nothing to talk about. Kole is absolutely right. It isn't a very common expression.