The routine

Nico, making snap judgments is worlds apart from discounting other people's experiences. I think Xingtian hinted towards something like a wider perspective that comes as a result of learning foreign languages. If the previous comments are the only kinds you are capable of making, then I think you have entirely missed the point of learning languages that Xingtian mentioned above: to "exchange good feelings by learning other languages." Your rhetoric above somehow manages to effect a smaller world with perspectives limited to your own.

Yes, language learning is difficult and takes lots of hard work. But how did you start? Didn't you just learn a couple phrases at first? Every journey begins with a step--and yet you criticize others for taking that first step.

Although, on the other hand, I myself can differentiate languages I am not learning in depth from languages in which I've picked up words here and there. But I don't think by any stretch of the imagination that such learning is useless or should be avoided because it's merely "memorizing" and not "learning a language." (In fact, dedicating sentences to memory can be an excellent and efficient way to memorize phrases and to learn examples of verb conjugation and pre/postposition/particle usage). Sometimes all it takes is a couple of words to warm someone's heart--you don't need an essay or critical analyses of political discourse (however fun those may be).

Learning other languages should above all open your mind to other people's views and perspectives. Perhaps in writing your words, so opposed to Xingtian's, you stimulated a dialogue that brought out the heart of the argument for learning languages that Xingtian intended to bring about himself

Also, I can't speak for law students, but first year medical students have a lot of clinical experience before they set foot in the school; they follow and learn from physicians and have a good grasp of what being a doc is like.

If you provided more context or how this phrase appears in the text from which you got it, we may be able to help you better!

I will say that the "VS," which can also be written as "vs" or "vs." is short for "versus." It means "in conflict with; against."

When used in writing, it is usually surrounded by two names (one coming before "VS" and one after). So, like this:

___ vs ___

If you are a boxing fan, you might come across this boxing match: "Muhammad Ali vs Chuck Wepner." If you are into MMA, there was that recent one, "Connor McGregor vs Nate Diaz." A soccer match could be written as "Ghana vs Paraguay." In legal language, it is abbreviated as simply "v," such as "Plessy v. Ferguson."

The word "versus" also has one other meaning which I will not explain here.

Hope that helps ان شا الله  !

My first impression was that you meant to write,

"You're the poem I can never write," which gives a slight difference in meaning as compared to English-Türkçe's suggestion.

English-Türkçe's suggestion: "You're the poem I could never write" implies that the speaker of the poem ("I") has tried to write about "you," but was for some reasons unable.

"You're the poem I couldn't ever write" perhaps implies something more hypothetical, meaning something like "Even if I tried, I would never be able to write a poem that describes you adequately."

My suggestion: "You're the poem I can never write" implies that no matter how much the speaker of the poem may try, "you" will always be a person that poems or words will never be able to describe (because he or she is so magnificent or awesome or lovely...something like that).

Hope that helps!