Profile
Learning
English
Language Skills
KoreanNative
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
| Last month | Last 3 months | All time | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed lessons | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Attendance rate | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
- Long story short, there is no much difference in a sentence. Not to repeat the same frame, I guess it is better to mix them – for instance, you don’t want to use too many thats in one sentence. If you want to know the detail, * 는 것 뛰는 나 / running me 걷는 나 / walking me Probably you already see how the affix works. The affix makes adjective forms of words (in this case, verbs). Instead of the pronoun “나”, you can use a noun “것” like in your example. * 기 뛰기 / running or to run 걷기 / walking or to walk This affix makes noun forms of words verbs (in this case, verbs) With “는” type of affixes, an additional noun is required and the noun will be the actual object in the sentence – not the activity word, while with “기” types of affixes, the activity noun directly becomes the object. 나는 뛰는 행동(것)을 좋아한다. / I like running activity 나는 뛰기를 좋아한다. / I like running In this manner, “기” gives the impression that the speaker is only focusing on the activity itself while with “기” , you can shift the focus to whatever you want to. 나는 뛰는 장소를 좋아한다 / I like a running ground. Time cannot be applied to “기” but possibly can be applied to adjective formed words. 나는 뛰기를 좋아한다. / I like running 나는 어제 뛰었던 일을 좋아한다. / I like it when I ran yesterday But “는” type can be ambiguous sometimes as the subject of phrase may not be the main subject. In the example of “나는 뛰는 것을 좋아한다”, it’s clearly me who likes running but it’s not clear whom I like to be running. Like “나는 내가 뛰는 것을 좋아한다” , the sentence can contain a full phrase. Otherwise, listens have to guess. “나는 움직이는 장난감이 좋아. “ can usually be “나는 움직이는 것이 좋아”. “나는 움직이는 것이 좋아” can be “I like moving or I like a thing moving”0 votedSeptember 11, 20132
- Hi Mojave, Let me try my very first answer in italki. :) >그게 말이 되나요? Does that make sense? >말이 되는 것 같아요? Does it possibly (or likely) make sense? It’s actually “does it sound like it make sense?” but do we use this expression in English? >말이 되나요? Make sense? >그 것은 뜻이 있나요? Does it have a (or any) meaning? >그 게 뜻은 있나요? Does it have a meaning? As you see, there is difference between “does it have a meaning?” and “does it make sense?” - pretty much the same difference in those Korean sentences. * 되다 As you know, “되다” is “become” but conceptually its coverage is quite similar to “make”. 1+1은 2가 된다 / 1+1 makes 2 1+1 은2 다 / 1+1 is 2 “된다” is focusing on the activity that one thing is transformed into the other like “make”. I have 4. Another 4 makes 8. 난 4가지고 있다. 4 더 있으면 8이 된다. * 말 Not only that abstract nouns have conceptual meanings, but material nouns are also stored in our brains as concept. As littlething mentions, 말 is literally anything that we speak and we understand – simple definition makes the range quite wide. Does it make 말? / 말이 되나요? that makes 말 / 말이 된다. Are you speaking 말? / 너 지금 말이라고 하는 거야? “너 지금 말하는 거야?” could also be that way but could be ambiguous as well . it could be actually “speaking 말(a language).“ Is that 말? / 그게 말이야? – let’s replace 말 with something simular in English. For instance, language. Even though language is a bit narrow and a bit physical compared to “sense” (or maybe it’s covering some other area), people would catch the meaning. Does it make more 말? 이게 더 말이 되나요? 말 is perfectly matching to the meaning of sense. Because its definition is so simple and it covers everything. Koreans are trained to associate 말 with anything that make sense in the wide coverage. Thanks.0 votedSeptember 10, 20131

00:00
00:00