Search from various English teachers...
Profile
hola, soy de colombia, de verdad estoy interesada en la lengua italiana, por alguna extraña razon (anque si o piensas bien no es extraña) estoy enamorada de ese hermoso pais, quiero visitarlo pero eso tendra que ser hasta dentro de un par de años, por ahora quiero saber su lengua. seria genial si encuentro gente que de verdad quiera ayudarme, a cambio yo les puedo ayudar con el español y el ingles. me gusta compartir el conocimiento, asi que si alguien quiere unas clases de español, que me contacte ;D PD mi ID de skype es shaira san
Learning
English
Italian
Language Skills
SpanishNative
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
 Last monthLast 3 monthsAll time
Completed lessons000
Attendance rate100%100%100%
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
  • Answered
    well for me the best way is reading and writing in a paper, that work for me, and after that you write, that someone corrects you
    0 voted
    July 11, 2013
    1
  • Commented

    hi

    is difficult to answer because as the Colombians as I have stereotypes that may offend if they are such, as it is for Americans.
    is valid to say that a stereotype does not define a person, it is only the perception that the media offer.
    to me Americans are megalomaniacs, control addicts, always want to have everything under control, also are somewhat pedantic, proud, and somewhat self-centered.
    but they are also very tenacious people who know what they want and do not rest until we get it, are workers and his stubbornness does not surrender easily.
    I do not know that this is true so it would be good that the Americans present to tell me if it's true or not.
    greetings

     

    0 voted
    July 11, 2013
    0
  • Commented

    grant, tank you for your answer and for clarify certain things. As I am not a historian, I don't know all the details, I speak from the little I've read and what i know superficially, it was never my intension accuse Christianity of ALL, because as you say, also greatly influenced the economic situation.

     

    With which I disagree is, so the Christianity (taken from the point of view of the fanaticism of the people) had nothing to do with the delay in the progress of science, because if I'm not wrong, the scientists who discovered wanted to publish something and were accused of sinners and were sent to kill. That had influence in many aspects.

     

    what continues to intrigue me is why they had to stop the advance of science so abruptly? and right in the twentieth century triggered a so voracious as fast?.

     

    I don't know if my question has an answer, but I would like to read what people thinks, so thanks for your complete answer

    0 voted
    July 11, 2013
    0
  • Posted
    history lately i had interested in the history, specially in the azteca and maya once. That interest began with the movie apocalypto, is a very nice adventure movie, i was researching about the production of this film and the expert storians says that there was a lot of mistakes, but the director defended that the movie was and adventure movie, not a historical film. Afther that i saw the history channel documentaries called humanity, the story all of us. and i saw some the mistakes of the story of the movie. But thanks to that documentaries i have a new interest in the history.
    July 10, 2013
    1
    0
  • Posted
    without the darkness of the Middle Ages

    that would happen to humanity if the Christian church had let science advance in those 10 centuries of repression?

    10 centuries of darkness are a lot!

    i think that maybe all the thinks that we are working in, like the impression 3D, google glases, space exploration, can be more and more advanced, or also,  we would be living in a spaceship because we would have destroyed the earth

    July 10, 2013
    6
    0
  • Posted
    the world spins faster

    Hi

    These days someone says that the world is spining more faster each year.

    what do you think?

    and which can be the reason?

    i think that definitely is true, i don't know why but i feel that the time is more short.

    I know that the time is very relative for echa person, that's why i want to know if i'm the onlyone that feel that.

    thanks :)

     

    July 10, 2013
    0
    0
  • Answered
    holas estoy muy de acuerdo con raul y con diego, pero a mi lo que me intriga es precisamente ¿por que en el siglo XX?, esta bien, en la edad media el oscurantismo no dejo que la ciencia avanzara, otro tema que me inquieta (que tal que en esos siglos de oscurantismo no hubieran existido, que seria de nosotros ahora?) pero si decimos que las guerras impulsaron la evolucion tecnologica, creo que han habido mas guerras en la edad media que en todo el siglo XX (es una mera suposicion). Ademas de lo anterior, sera que los humanos del siglo XX eran mas inteligentes? o mas curiosos? que hiso que esas personas avanzaran mas y los de los anteriores siglos lo hiciran tan lento? estas preguntas quiza no tengan respuestas, pero asi empezo el avance del hombre, filosofando. saludos y gracias por contestar :D
    0 voted
    July 10, 2013
    0
  • Answered
    no tienen una diferencia muy grande, lo que los diferencia es el uso -hoy-, se usa para hacer enfasis en el dia actual ej: hoy es martes -hoy en dia- se puede usar para comparar 2 periodos de tiempo ej: a principios del siglo 20 no existian los computadores hoy en dia son los articulos mas vendidos en todo el mundo. espero que esto responda tu inquietud.
    0 voted
    July 9, 2013
    0
  • Posted
    que tenia el siglo 20? que tenia el siglo 20 que hiso que la ciencia avanzara tanto y tan rapido? si miras la historia de la humanidad, fue el siglo donde se disparo la tecnologia, ¿por que sucedio esto en el siglo 20 y no en un siglo previo a este?
    July 9, 2013
    6
    1
  • Corrected
    0 voted
    July 9, 2013
    0