Works Work

<em>     For talking about a job, say "</em><em>work"</em>.<em> As a noun, we usually don't use "work" </em><em>in the plural</em><em>.</em>

I would like to be employed at a work that is not routine. I'd like to have a job that's not routine.

<em>     It's more fluid to say "I would like to have a job..." Also the word choice of "work" vs. "job:" work is a more general term, and is the choice when you need a verb, like you would say "I'm going to work," "I work at an office," or "I have a lot of work to do." It also has a slight connotation of manual labor as opposed to office or more advanced skills. So if you said, "I'm a worker in an office," people would think you're a janitor or warehouse worker or something, instead of an accountant or salesperson.</em>

<em>     Your job is specifically what you do every day, like "I found a job," or "My job is very difficult."</em>

As for the work camp, As for my line of work,

<em>     I'm guessing you're translating "campo de trabajo," which would be better translated as "the line of work," or it could be "the field of..."</em>

I would like to be employed at the sector of investigation of diseases or development of electronic devices. I would like to go into the field of...

<em>     Again, "be employed at" is a rather wordy construction, and the passive voice makes it sounds a little weak. "Sector" works here as a vocab word, but a more elegant way to phrase that whole chunk is "I'd like to go into the field of disease investigation..." </em>

Why? The response is because I like to help to the world with the new discoveries Why? because I like to help the world with new discoveries

<em>     "Answer" is a better word here than "response." You could also just dump that entire phrase and say "Why? Because I like to..."
     "To" in "to the world" isn't necesary here. We don't use "to" like Spanish uses the personal "a," and we seldom use "to" with objects, except sometimes to distinguish an indirect object from a direct object (ex. Give it to me). But that's not even necessary (Give me it).</em>

<em></em><em>     "The" isn't necessary here either.</em>

and on the other hand to to extend my knowledge,

<em>     "On the other hand" implies a stronger contrast than you were probably meaning here. Helping the world with new discoveries and extending your knowledge are closely related activities, probably both encouraging each other, so you could say "I like both helping the world with new discoveries and extending my knowledge." "Both...and..." implies two similar things (ex. I like both chicken and beef),  and "on the other hand" implies two opposite things (I like chicken, but on the other hand, I like being vegetarian, too.) I know, it's a really picky thing, but the way you had it, extending your knowledge would be at odds with helping the world, like "I want to make new discoveries, but on the other hand I want to keep all those discoveries to myself and not use them to help anyone."</em>

<em>     You just put "to" in twice by accident probably :-)</em> 

since from always my zeal is to learn all things that i can observe of the world.

     <em>First off, "passion" instead of "zeal" would be a better choice in the context of work.</em>

<em>     Guessing you're saying "desde siempre?" I would write this as "Since my passion has always been learning everything I can about the world." I kind of rewrote that whole sentence, but yeah that sounds better. Another option would be "I have always had a passion for learning..."</em>

In addition, I do not look for a career according to his remuneration due to if you are good at your work, you always will receive a good salary. ...according to its salary, because if you are...

     <em>A career isn't a person, so it would be "its."</em>

     <em>"Remuneration" isn't a word I'd ever use in normal speech or even writing, just go with "its pay" or better, say "...according to how much you get paid."</em>

     <em>"Due to if..." doesn't sound right. "Due to" should be followed by a noun. Also the relationship between the two clauses implied by "due to" doesn't quite work. "Due to" indicates a result of a prior action or event, a cause-and-effect relationship: "I couldn't hear due to the loud music coming from next door." "Because" would be a better choice here, and it uses fewer words so that's better too. (If you're really into this sort of picky grammar thing (because I am, if you didn't guess by now), here's an article about it: http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/because-due-to-since-as.aspx)</em>

I want to know my mistakes. Thanks for help ^^.

<em>There you go, I found a couple. Hope it helps! :-)</em>

<em>Building off of Ahmed's corrections...</em>

<em>
</em>

First notebook entry: Introducing myself

I am learning English because I want to live and study abroad. 
My native language is Persian and I grow up in Iran. 

<em>You would want to say </em>"I grew up in Iran." Grow<em> is the present and </em>grew <em>is the past, so if you were talking about your childhood, </em>grew <em>is the appropriate form.</em>

<em>If you grew up in Iran and are still living there and that's what you're trying to say, go with </em>"I live in Iran" <em>or</em> "I have lived in Iran my whole life" <em>to really emphasize the point.</em>

I significantly enjoy studying and learning English.

<em>This is correct, but it's an odd word to use in this context. </em><em>Try </em>"I really enjoy..." <em>or </em>"I enjoy studying and learning English a lot."

Tutors should show to the students the way to keep in the major and try to motivate them with the idea that the last years of the major are dedicated to more specific topics 

<em>In Spanish I know you have to be careful about including all the right objects and the prepositions that go along with them, so that phrase would be </em>"Tutores deben mostrar(les) a los estudiantes," <em>but that extra </em>"a" <em>from Spanish something that is unnecessary in English. It's correct, but it just feels a little odd. It sounds more natural to say </em>"Tutors should show the students the way to (etc.)". <em>The sentence structure makes it obvious that </em>"students"<em> is the indirect object and </em>"the way..."<em> is the direct object. That's a very common and constant construct in English </em>(subject + verb + ind. object + direct object)<em> and the </em>"to"<em> before the indirect object is rarely ever required.</em>

Advisors should show ways to go on and what is coming, the following years are focused on specific topics about the course.

<em>The two phrases that are underlined are parallel in the structure of the sentence, and again, what you wrote is correct but sounds a little odd. </em>"Ways to go on" <em>is a noun and</em> "what is coming" <em>is a noun clause. To make the sentence sound better, both things should be the same part of A way to make this sentence mroe fluid would be to rewrite it so that both of those are a noun:</em>

Advisors should show ways to go on and the things that are coming.

<em>Or turn both of them in to clauses:</em>

Advisors should show how to go on and what is coming.

<em>Between the two, the second one sounds better to me. Just a picky little thing that will make your English sound better! Hope you like grammar as much as I do haha.</em>

Dan