Profile
I want to look for a language exchange partner and I want to help native English speakers to learn or study Chinese .my native language is Chinese . and I want to teach them in a special way in the shortest possible time .
Learning
English
Language Skills
Chinese (Mandarin)Native
Interests
Sports & Fitness
Medical & Healthcare
Art
Music
Writing
Activities
- 你的英语原文: Reward or punishment are meted out quite independent of human interference. 语法解释: The word “independent”is an adjective, so the “quite independent of human interference”(完全不受人类的干预影响的) is an adjective phrase , which functions as an attribute , and which should grammatically be after the noun which/that it modifies: Reward or punishment “quite independent of human interference” are meted out, whereby or however, this structure is not common or popular because of its “heavy subject” or “top heavy sentence”. Such sentence should be rewritten grammatically as : Reward or punishment are meted out quite independent of human interference. Or rather: Reward or punishment , quite independent of human interference, are meted out. (实施完全不受人类的干预影响的奖励或惩罚) Grammatically, this sentence can also be interpreted as the separation between the subject noun and its attribute. (语法上也可以把该句子解释为主语名词和其定语的分离)0 votedOct 14, 2026 6:30 AM0
- Hello,native English speakers. Questions about one real sentence which reflects four pairs of sentences. 1a. During this period, the new barrister will gain practical experience not to be acquired in the lecture room. 1b. During this period, the new barrister will gain practical experience not to acquire in the lecture room. Which is grammatically correct? Do they have the same meaning? 2a. During this period, the new barrister will gain practical experience which/that he can not acquire in the lecture room. 2b. During this period, the new barrister will gain practical experience which/that he can not been acquired in the lecture room. The same question as above. 3a. During this period, the new barrister will gain practical experience which he had not acquired in the lecture room. 3b. During this period, the new barrister will gain practical experience which he have not acquired in the lecture room. The same question as above. 4a. During this period, the new barrister will gain practical experience who can not acquire it in the lecture room. ( I deliberately and flexibly play grammar by use of the relative pronoun who (= the new barrister) and pronoun “it”( it = practical experience) 4b. During this period, the new barrister will gain practical experience which who can not acquire it in the lecture room. ( I deliberately and flexibly show off grammar by use of the relative pronoun which (which = practical experience) and pronoun who ( who = the new barrister) Which is/are grammatically correct? (I have never seen such a relative clause with two relative pronouns , but theoretically it works. I deem both are wrong but want to know how the native English speakers think of them.)Oct 9, 2026 1:55 AM33
- Hello native English speakers. 1a. He is looking for a place to live in.= 1b. He is looking for a place in which to live= 1c. He is looking for a place to live (?) 2a. a good restaurant for Tom to eat at.= 2b. a good restaurant at which forTom to eat. 3a. a good restaurant to eat at.= 3b. a good restaurant to eat. 4. There is somewhere to practice . 5. There is where to practice. Question: Which is grammatically correct?Sep 14, 2026 5:14 AM11
- 看原文: — because wearing outdoor shoes indoors____ (break) their “natural order”. 因为这句前面有一个破折号, 是说明原因或道理的的,这种原因或道理描述的是“通常的道理”,任何时候都是这种道理,它与谓语动词“break”动作的时间无关(讨论过去,现在,或将来)都是这个道理,有点类似于就好像“地球绕着太阳转”那样,是一个真理。所以用一般现在时(第三人称单数breaks)→这是因为动作break的主语(the agent of the verb “break”)是动名词短语“ wearing outdoor shoes”(穿着户外的鞋),后面的indoors (注意indoor 是形容词,而这儿是以s结尾的“indoors”为副词) 是副词。 译文: — 因为穿着户外的鞋进入室内会打破它们的“固有秩序”。0 votedSep 6, 2026 3:18 PM0
- Hello native English speakers. Thank you very much in advance. Questions about three real sentences. 1a. There is every reason to celebrate. 1b. There is every reason for which to celebrate. 1c. There is every reason to celebrate for. Which is grammatically correct? Do they have the same meaning? 2a. She found a quiet spot to read. 2b. She found a quiet spot at which to read. 2c. She found a quiet spot to read at. Which is grammatically correct? Do they have the same meaning? 3a. We shall have many days to talk things over. 3b. We shall have many days on which to talk things over. 3c. We shall have many days to talk things over on. 3d. We shall have many days for which to talk things over. 3e. We shall have many days to talk things over for. 3f. We shall have many days in which to talk things over. 3g. We shall have many days by which to talk things over. Which is grammatically correct? Do they have the same meaning?Sep 6, 2026 2:48 PM51
- Hello native English speakers. Thank you very much in advance. Three real questions perhaps covering the same grammatical issue. 1a. plenty of money with which to carry out the project = 1b. plenty of money to carry out the project with. = 1c. plenty of money to carry out the project. Which noun phrase is grammatically correct? Do they have the same meaning? 2a. He needs plenty of money to carry out the project. 2b. He needs plenty of money to carry out the project with. 2c. He needs plenty of money with which to carry out the project. Which is grammatically correct? Do they have the same meaning? 3a. We need some time to rest. 3b. We need some time for which to rest. = We need some time which to rest for.? 3c. We need some time to rest for. 3d. We need some time for us to rest. 3e. We need some time for us to rest for. Which is grammatically correct? Do they have the same meaning?Sep 2, 2026 9:45 AM21
- Hello native English speakers. Thank you very much in advance. There are many contexts where native and non-native speakers are at an advantage if they understand not just polished, elegant language, but the full breadth of ordinary and unusual expressions (both those that are grammatical and those whose grammaticality is perhaps questionable). (original) I guess : if they understand not just polished, elegant language, but the full breadth of ordinary and unusual expressions = 1. if they understand the full breadth of ordinary and unusual expressions rather than just polished, elegant language.? OR, 2. if they understand not only just polished, elegant language, but also the full breadth of ordinary and unusual expressions. ? Which is correct by grammar and by the context of the original?Aug 31, 2026 12:14 PM21
- Hello native English speakers. Thank you very much in advance. Question about mixed-time conditional sentences ( six real sentences) 1a. If you had eaten more for breakfast, you would not be hungry = 1b. If you had eaten more for breakfast (at that time), you would not be hungry (now)= 1c. If you had eaten more for breakfast (at that time), you would not have been hungry now. (✔or✘??) 【P³³²】 (I guess the degree of the correctness is : 1a= 1b >1c ??.) Question: Which is grammatically correct? Do they have the same meaning? 2a. If I had worked harder at school I would be sitting in a comfortable office now. = 2b. If I had worked harder at school I would have been sitting in a comfortable office now(✔or ✘??) Question: Which is grammatically correct? Do they have the same meaning? 3a . If I had worked harder at school I would be sitting in a comfortable office in the future.= 3b. If I had worked harder at school I would have been sitting in a comfortable office in the future.(✔or✘??) The same question as above. 4. If the Government had not made so many mistakes when it first came to office, it would win the next election.= If the Government had not made so many mistakes when it first came to office, it would have won the next election.(✔or✘??) The same question as above. 5a. If I had had the money , I should have paid you. = 5b. If I had had the money (at the present moment), I should have paid you at that time(✔or✘??) The same question as above. 6a. If he had been really interested in buying the property, he would have made an offer before now = 6b. If he were really interested in buying the property, he would have made an offer before now. = If he were really interested in buying the property at that time, he would have made an offer at that time (=before now?) The same question as above.Aug 13, 2026 2:27 PM30
- Hello native English speakers. Thank you very much in advance. Queries about three real sentences. 1. Be she fairer than the day, Or the flowery meads in May, If she be not so to me, What care I how fair should be? Query: so =?(I guess so = beautiful, but it seems not to be in line with the context by logic) 2. Everybody talk at once.→ (turn it into negative sentence): 2a. Don't everybody talk at once! 2b. Don't talk at once everybody. Query: Which is grammatically correct? 3. Open the door.,→(turn it into negative sentence): 3a. Don't open the door. 3b. Don't anyone open the door.= 3c. Don't open the door anyone. Query: Which is grammatically correct?Aug 10, 2026 9:47 AM30

00:00
00:00