Like in English, there are many ways to express the idea of being confused in Chinese, each with a subtle difference in its meaning. The most common way of saying "I'm confused" may well be to say "我乱了" or "我被搞乱了". Literally, 乱 means chaos or disorder, which is a pretty apt description of the state of being confused. It also avoids specifying which type of confusion the speaker is experiencing, which I'll now explain. Some of the subtle shades of meaning can be seen by examining the characters involved. For example, the difference between 迷惑 and 困惑 is in the first character of each compound. 迷 is usually used to denote disorientation and temptation, while 困 is used to express the idea of being trapped. Thus, "我迷惑了" indicates being confused by moral temptation and thus being unable to distinguish between right or wrong, while "我困惑了" would indicate being confused because one is confronted with a difficult problem. "我糊涂了" has the connotation that the speaker may be going senile or, more generally speaking, becoming dumb, because 糊涂 means being fuzzy or confused about things in general. As for sentence construction, it's usually the case that you don't use a plain structure, unless you wish to be poetic. Instead, you add a verb, like 搞 (literally, "to do/make", but with the connotation of stirring things up for good or evil), 感到 (to feel) or 被 (only for the case of 迷惑/困惑, which then transforms the sentence into the passive voice). Notice that I left out 搞混了 in your third sentence. This is because in this sentence, "confuse" is used in the sense of "to get mixed up", i.e. "Don't mix up Johnson and Jonson". In the Chinese sentence, 混 means "to mix", so 搞混了 means to make something become mixed up.

For no. 1, did you mean to say that you fly from Beijing to Hongkong and back again once every month? If so, it'd be 我每个月都会从北京到香港打来回儿。 Here, 打来回儿 means to do a return trip. If you mean to say that you make several trips a month, then say 打几个来回儿 instead, i.e. add 几个 ("a few") in front of 来回儿 to say that there are a few return trips being made. For no. 2, I don't think that the sentence makes sense in English either. Are you saying that "I'm always going back and forth between my school and my home every day"? To suggest the ennui of the student in this statement, I'd say 我每天就是在学校和家里之间打圈圈的。 Here, 打圈圈 means going around in circles. I'd use 家里 instead of just 家, so that the number of syllables matches up with 学校. No. 3 would be: 她一边在等消息，一边在她房间里焦虑地走来走去。 "While she's waiting for the news, she paces back and forth anxiously in her room" This construction uses "一边..., 一边...", which is like the "while" construction in English.

把手机的电池给充满 手机 - Cell phone 电池 - Battery 充满 - In this case, fully charge, as in 充 (charge) + 满 (fully). However, this usually means "full of".

In the sentence "我很喜欢这里", 这里 is a direct object of the verb 喜欢, so you don't need the preposition. This should be better translated as "I like this place very much", and not "I like here very much", as implied in your question. This second translation is also weird in English, by the way. In the other sentence "我呆在这里", 在这里 gives the location that modifies the verb 呆. When 这里 is used as a location instead of just an ordinary object, you need the preposition 在. In the case of "liking a place", "a place" is an object taken by "like", not a location, so the preposition is not needed. To put it another way, suppose I replace 这里 with 俄罗斯. Then it's quite clear that 我很喜欢俄罗斯 = I like Russia very much (no preposition, because "like" requires a direct object, "Russia") 我呆在俄罗斯 = I'm staying in Russia (preposition required because "stay" requires a location) As for the example given by bear234 - "这里曾经发生过一个很感人的故事" - 这里 now functions as the subject/topic of the sentence, even though it also gives the location where the "感人的故事" took place, so the preposition 在 is rarely used, if at all. The comma is also superfluous - though it may have stylistic value - in this particular sentence. Hope that helps.

Each structure is grammatically correct and an example of the passive voice, but there is a difference between the two. The structure "was + past participle" is in the passive voice and describes something that was happening in the past. So there are usually other events and action that follow, because this is a "narrative" tense. In contrast, the structure "have + been + past participle" is in the present perfect tense, as well as being in the passive voice. The perfect ("retrospective" would be a better description) tense draws your attention to the consequences of a prior action, rather than just simply narrating the past action. Thus, the effect is that it feels more "immediate" than the "was + past participle" structure. Let me give another example, say, using "I was made" vs. "I have been made": - "I was made an officer of the army." (I felt so proud to serve my country, until they deployed us to the war, etc, etc, ...) - "I have been made an officer of the army." (Let's go party!)

更羨慕他。。。

我上网看图片时，我找到了这一张。
看着这张图片，我好羨慕他的，因为他年轻，也应该他有很有钱。我更羨慕他有漂亮的爱人。
他既能营业（？？），又能多休息，更能够有很多爱人， 我觉得他可以不工作。
他不用天天上办公室，而大家都会尊敬他。。。
我是普通的俄罗斯的懒人，哭着写- 有最无聊的工作，天天得上办公室。 到我每天早上都是还没过完，就已经想睡觉了。。。

 

不知道你用“营业”这两个字是想要表达什么意思呢？“营业”只能用来形容商店、生意、业务等的运作，不能用来形容一个人的动作。

1. The pronoun "ihr", when uncapitalised, denotes the nominative familiar second person plural. This is reflected in the conjugation of the verb "sparen" in this sentence, which is "spart", the conjugation for "ihr". 2. Both are equivalent words for "equipment", so it's really a matter of how commonly each is used. I've found that gym equipment can be Fitnessgeräte, Fitnessausrüstung. Gymnastikausrüstung or Gymnastikgeräte. Safety equipment can be either Sicherheitsausrüstung or Sicherheitsgeräte.

Ah, this is always an interesting question. Do they have to adapt the tones to the music? In ancient times, yes. There used to be melodies that you would use as a meter for your poetry. One famous example is the lyrics to the pop song Dan Yuan Ren Chang Jiu (但願人長久), sung by pop artistes like Teresa Teng and Faye Wong, which is actually a poem in the cí style written by Su Dongpo. The poet himself actually based the meter of the poem on another melody, known as Shui Diao Ge Tou (水调歌头, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shui_diao_ge_tou), which is not the melody of the pop song. Nowadays, these rules are not observed so strictly, so that is why some people say that they can't understand what the singers are singing. This is actually a well-known consequence, and there are mondegreens that arise from the mismatch between the intended tone of the syllable and what the melody forces the singer to produce. Good songwriters will, in any case, work very hard to make sure the tones in the lyrics match the melody of the music.