Search from various English teachers...
Profile
I'm currently living in South Korea as an English teacher. I'm starting my grad studies here this upcoming fall, but I still don't know how it's going to be. I'm also learning Japanese. I passes N5 and now I'm preparing to take N4. I can't say much yet, but I would like to practice more since I study it by myself^^. I've been wanting to learn Thai, but the writing seems to be another language in itself. That's what makes it so interesting to me. I love to read and it's the main reason I learn languages lol. I also love to talk to people even if I might be a bit shy at first. *Ps: If there's anyone who needs a practice partner for Spanish, I can help.
Learning
Korean
Japanese
Chinese (Mandarin)
Thai
Language Skills
EnglishNative
SpanishNative
French
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
 Last monthLast 3 monthsAll time
Completed lessons000
Attendance rate100%100%100%
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
  • Posted
    문법 연습: A/V ㄴ/는 반면에 I just want to know if I'm using the grammar structure correctly. 1. 작년에 운동하지 못한 반면에 올해는 아침마다 운동한다. 2. 시외에서 살면서 생활비 싼 반면에 대중교통 수단이 불편하다. 3. 서울 교통수단 편한 반면에 시외보다 더 어려울 것 같다.
    May 8, 2016
    2
    1
  • Posted
    -는/은 것, could anyone explain it to me Still can't wrap my head around -는/은 것.....I've been going around it and still don't get it. I understand it but I can't seem to produce anything with that.... I would prefer it to be explained either simply or with a linguistic approach....I will be extremely grateful.
    May 20, 2013
    1
    0
  • Corrected
    0 voted
    May 17, 2013
    0
  • Posted
    I still don´t understand the differences between -는 것, -기 and -고. As I understand it -고 is used to link verbs that speaks about the same subject. I've tried to look for more explanations on -는 것 and -기 but haven't found anything. If someone could be so kind to explain when each is used with examples, I will be really grateful. Ps. I've been trying to understand the last two but it all translates into an -ing form (which doesn't help at all when in Spanish there's also different constructions).
    March 3, 2013
    3
    0
  • Answered
    Cuando utilizas "había" es cuando estas describiendo una escena (que todavía tiene concecuencia en el presente) mientras que hubo es utilizado con una acción que ya teminó. Ej. Cuando yo llegué, había mucha gente. (Descripción) Durante la dictadura hubo miles de muertos y desaparecidos. (Evento que terminó en el pasado)
    0 voted
    March 3, 2013
    0
  • Answered
    I can't is correct. I not can is not because not only you're thinking in Spanish but also it would be cannot (it's contraction is can't, therefore the negation can't go before the verb). Usually, the negation (when it requires not, but there are verbs who have the negations by adding a prefix) comes after the principal verb like: You wouldn't (would not) do it.
    0 voted
    November 24, 2012
    0
  • Corrected
    0 voted
    November 24, 2012
    0
  • Answered
    You know that in English there's the we/us which means the same thing. Only that you use we in the start of the sentence and us when it's at the end. On the "tu/ti" case, tú is a personal pronoun which works as a subject. However, when tu is not accentuated it becomes a possessive so it always requires a noun after it. Ex: Tu casa y tu perro (your house and your dog). Ti is another pronoun which it's always used at the end of the sentence and it doesn't accept a noun after it. In order to use para tu... it needs a noun to make it correct and it will always require something before too. Ex: Vas para tu casa?
    0 voted
    November 12, 2012
    0
  • Posted
    저의 취미는 책읽기예요. Is this construction correct? I'm not sure if it's really correct or if it sounds natural.
    October 27, 2012
    1
    0
  • Answered
    This is a subordinated sentence. The conjunction "que" is working as a subordinating one. Therefore the part where it divides is starting from "que". Principal part: Lee la carta Subordinated part: que le escribe a su familia
    0 voted
    October 17, 2012
    2