preserve historic building or traditional building Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for the government to spend money on new buildings than to preserve historic or traditional buildings and homes. Along with city modernization, multitudes of traditional buildings have been demolished, a phenomenon that deserves people’s contemplation. Some people maintain that historic buildings are the symbol of city’s history, they cannot be destroyed for establishing modern skyscrapers. On contrary, other individuals point out that these old buildings, taking up a huge space, contain no value, which are supposed to be removed from the modern city. When dealing with this issue, people ought to comprehensively consider this topic and avoid oversimplification. First of all, historic buildings contain conventional values, which are conducive to attract an ocean of visitors and bring huge economic benefits to the city. Currently, citizens are obsessed with visiting traditional buildings, an vivid approach to reminisce elapsed history. In Beijing, hundreds of thousands people come to witness the magnificent Forbidden City, which used to be the emperor’s living place. Not only does the Forbidden City represent the history of Beijing, but also it has brought great tourist revenues to government. Demolishing traditional building do harm to economic development as well as erase the unique history of city. In addition, traditional buildings serve as the symbol of city, which enable the city to be unique and differentiate from other cities. Temple of Earth，an architecture used for worship ceremony, is the mark of Beijing. Chinese students are invariably required to visit this historic building, in order to learn about the structure of traditional building and comprehend its religious function. Moreover, to research and exploit the color utilization in historic buildings, scholars travel thousands of miles to Temple of Earth and study the color manifested in Temple of Earth. It simply contained four colors, which are red, white, grey and yellow, whereas these four color combined in diverse way to show the principle of royal institutions(皇家建筑?). Therefore, ruining historic buildings make all the cities become same and lost history value in research.

Teaching is harder than it was in the past. - 2 Please help me to revise my TOFEL essay Utilizing lots of standards to appraise teachers, schools require teachers to hold vital research projects, take care of children’s mental health, and use high-tech teaching methods, especially using Powerpoint to give lectures. In the past, teacher only need to consider how to improve the teaching quality, how to use simple examples to let students comprehend the abstract concept and how to arrange the assignments to let students master the knowledge points. While in the present day, teachers have to spend time and energy to make elaborate lecture PPT. Competing to get promotion in university, teachers have to attempt to create a new research topic. All these additional activities enable teachers to spend less time on preparing for class and improving the teaching qualities. Thus, teaching nowadays become difficult, because teachers have to simultaneously take care so many works.

Do you agree or disagree Teaching is harder than it was in the past- 1 Who can help me to revise my TOFEL essay? With the advent of information age, people nowadays are exposed to an ocean of knowledge. Nowadays, students have a wide range of choices to study. They can simply open the website and watch famous universities’ open courses to learn professional knowledge. On the other hand, the progressive technologies may pose negative effects on students, for the internet is full of enticements. Personally, I prefer the statement that teaching is harder nowadays than the past. First of all, children are easily distracted by various things. High technology products, such as sophisticated computers, iPads, smartphones, easily grab the attention from children. Recently, multitudes of researches and news reports concentrate on the issue of children overplaying iPad or computer games. Not only do electronic devices exert harm to the children’s health, but also they reduce the time that teenagers spend on study. In China, some teachers forbid students to take smart phones to school, in order to reduce using of smartphones in class. Teachers frequently find that students, facing various temptation in the virtual world, usually communicate with others via wechat, or keep reading the news on Facebook or Twitter. All these behaviors severe affect the study effect. Even in some cases, students use smartphones to cheat on exams. Obviously, up-to-state electronic products make teaching much more difficult, for it distract students from focusing on study.