Recycling system in Sydney and San Francisco(2) Thirdly, they all have a good institution to encourage people classify and recycle rubbish. For instance, in Sydney if inhabitant throwing rubbish away without classification, they will receive warning. In San Francisco, the government already made the law to recycle garbage. Besides provisions of law, government cannot purchase appliance which is unrecyclable or release poison gas. However there are still have some different between the recycling system in Sydney and San Francisco. Firstly, those two cities have different range for recycle garbage. It is already been proved by San Francisco’s recycling system. San Francisco’s recycling system always including cooking oil. But most of citizens from Sydney prefer put it into unrecyclable bin. While, according to the data, San Francisco’s recycling company can receive 10000 gallon cooking oil per week. It can be used in produce biofuel. To summarize, Sydney need prefect its recycling system in order to make lager interest .s f w r d t e s r e w r e d r w r w Secondly, in San Franciso’s recycle system, public and recycling company already focus on water recycle. By contrast, the people from Sydney do not always care about water resource, because of the unique geographical environmental, Sydney invariably can gain enough water. While, in San Francisco public already accept and use recycled water. San Francisco's potential uses of recycled water include: irrigation of parks, medians and other landscaped areas, toilet and urinal flushing, industrial processing and cooling, and in decorative fountains.3 Because of in San Francisco, people are invariably faced with such an issue which is they cannot gain enough water. Otherwise, it is impossible to operate this city without water. However, although Sydney do not lack of water, it still is not a wise choice to waste it.

Recycling system in Sydney and San Francisco(1) Nowadays, an increasing number of people realized recycling system have a vital position for human’s life. Through this system, factory will be able to receive rubbish and produce profit, this action not only reduce people’s living cost but benefit the environment. As a international city, Sydney always concentrate on garbage recycle and use. The same thing also happened in San Francisco, USA. This essay will discuss the samilarity and differentia between recycling system in Sydney and San Francisco. Firstly, both of those citizens in Sydney and San Francisco all have same philosophy, which is rubbish must be classify and recycle. Since children became knowing the things theirs parents will told them they should bring rubbish into the bin. When children became older, theirs parents will teach them to classify the rubbish. For example, there is a children from Sydney called Frank, his family always receive some international student. Since they arrived those international students will be told they should classify rubbish. The same situation also happened in San Francisco. Children and teenagers always able to received garbage recycling education. Besides, the exorbitant fine also will reminding people keep the rules. Secondly, those two cities all have advanced recycling system. For example, Sydney has built the first underground bin in Darlinghurststreet. “With fewer bins to deal with collecting the waste will be quicker and quieter. The giant bins will be hoisted to the surface by hydraulic lifts and emptied into garbage trucks as normal by City staff” (Lord Mayor Clover Moore 2013).1 The San Francisco recycling and garbage law effective as of late October 2009 requires every household and business to use three different bins for discards: blue for recyclables (e.g., cans, bottles, paper, yogurt containers); green for compostables (e.g., food scraps, leaves, dirty paper napkins); and black for trash (including plastic bags, Styrofoam and diapers). Many San Franciscans have been using the three-bin system for months or years, but now it is mandatory.2 So it is easy to draw a conclusion, both of those cities have advanced recycling system.

global warming Now, an increasing number of people think the situation of global warming becoming more and more danger. Some people think humankind can slow down even slove this problem, but others shows negative attituade. This essay explores both sides of the debate. It is no doublt that carbon dioxide result in this issue. As we know people’s life will produce some waste gas, carbon dioxide is one of these, for example,car’s end gas, factor’s production and so on. As far as I am considered, factor’s employee always cannot dispose those waste gas in right way is the main reason to caused carbon dioxide rise in the atmoshere.

i write it long time ago Some people may hold the opinion that the most important prodlem will be solved in the future, but others have a negative attitude. As far as I am concerned, all questions will get an answer after some years. Because Rome is not build in a day. People is still too young and still have a long way to go. Firstly, if we just looked at what we cannot solve, we didn’t know what we already changed. Many years ago, people only can get food from hunting and even cannot use fire. At that time ,people didn’t know what they were able to change. But everyone knows that, we did it. We build a flourishing society . We invent many things to use, such as car plane telephone and so on. Before we invent those we also think it is impossible. So, looked at this achievements you can understand the human’s power. Secondly, we never know what we can do unless we made it. I have a good friend, his name is Jay chou. Now , he is a very famous singer in China even in the world. But before he star to try it, nobody knew him. When he was young he wanted to be a singer, but he didn’t think that he will success. But on the contrary, he made it. So you cannot understand what you can do if you donot try it. Last but not least, we have many outstanding talent. Such as 爱因斯坦，牛顿，袁隆平《people's name》，they all promote our society. Now, we have increase school in the world, which give us the best edcuation. Through this knowladge, our world become better and better. Undoubtedly, this progress will not stop. To summarize, ireinforce my stand point that every problem will be solve in a few years late. Because people still have creativity and people are so young that we can develop. But the most important reason is that people never give up.

just something Three mounth ago I could have a chance to go to santa barbara city colleage ,I think this school is very suit for me. Because I do not need spend too much money and I can get a opportunity to transfor a famous university. Such as University of California – Berkeley or Los Angles. I know it is very diffcult,but it is not impossible, so I want to try and prove myself. Unfortunately, I failled my visa interview, because my school made a stupide mistake in my I-20, then I have to change my mind. Now I will go to Australia, I think I will get a better future no matter where I am.

just want say something i am from china,as you know before we going to university we would taken a exam ,and it called Chinese colleague entrance examination. Unfortunately，even i study very hard i still lost it.we spend more than fifteen hours a day to study and sleep less than five hours,we study so many major such as mathematics,biology,chemistry，Chinese，English.i always wondering that why we need study so many, because you just choice one major in university.in fact ,my score is not so bad ,but i cannot go to a famous colleague. i think i deserve a better one. so i choice oversea study. that means you must stay alone and far away from some people. your farther and mother, your girlfriend ,your friend. but i want get a better future and return with honour, respect, knowladge. I wish i can made it.

Some people think that computers and the internet are more important to a child’s edcautation than Now, an increasing number of students prefer study online than go to school. Some people think it is a good trend for society ,but others have negative attitude, this essay explore both views of the debate. First, it is no doubt that teachers can make sure learners attend class. As we know, study always boring and hard but teachers are able to help educators control themselves. I think children will easy to become lazzy without teacher. What is more,the teacher can help children study anytime. When student learn new knowladge or some difficult subjects they usually have many problem they cannot slove it alone. If they study at classroom, professor would give them some advices to help them find the answer. While, those students whose study by long-distance learning cannot get help so convenience. However, internet education also have its own advantage. Absolutely only the most experence teacher can teach on the internet. Such as a famous professor, a knowladgeble master and so on. learners may get some speical experience from them. But as far as I am considered, school’s teacher already get enough knowladge and experiencement to teach their students. Besides, diferent children has different problem, these issues only can be solved through face to face teaching. That is why school’s edcutation cannot be taken by other ways. Taking into account all of these factors, we may reach a conclusion that long-distance learning cannot replace tradition education. School’s learning still is the best way to recive knowladge.