It's not a tree
I watched a korean program with English subs which had this written:
저거 나무 잖아요!
That's not a tree!
May I ask how is it different from
저거 나무 안 예요!
And is it possible a contraction of
저거 나무지 않아요!
Thanks.
By the way, is it:
저거 나무 안 예요!
or
저거 나무 안 이예요!
Search from various English teachers...
Answers · 2
1
I hope a Korean native will answer, because I m not! Sorry for that, but, to the best of my knowledge, the only correct way to say: "That s not a tree" is 저거 나무(가) 아니에요 (beware of the spelling, u can also commonly find 아니예요).
This is impossible: 저거 나무지 않아요!
Now, for me, the only possible interpretation of 저거 나무잖아요! is positive, something like "That's a tree, don't you see?". There s a flavour of "contrary to what u seem to think, that's a tree!" Would appreciate help from a native though...
0
Hujok is correct^^ you are 한글 is good.
저거 나무 잖아요! --- That's a tree
That's not a tree! --> i will rewrite --> 저건 나무가 아냐( or 아니에요)
2. 저거 나무 안예요 and 저거 나무 안 이예요
- both are impossible sentance,
Still haven’t found your answers?
Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
