不管有没有something, 我都要完成/做成/去做a particular thing. 不管有没有something, kind of equals "even though the necessary condition to do something is not there," 不管有没有something，该做的还是要做的。 不管someone来不来, 咱们这个会肯定还是要开的。 不管someone 帮不帮我，这次事我会替你解决的。 不管someone 同意不同意，我就是要这么做。

不管是米饭还是面条，好吃就行。 according to my understand about what you want to express, this sentence change to above will be better. 然后关于“不管有没有。。，” this words means " don't care have or not " so need add a thing or stuff you are sure to get or must to do. eg. 不管有没有电，今天我一定要把工作做完。 eg. 不管你这里有没有米饭，我今天一定要吃到米饭。

Language is not a word play, it's simply a combination, i don't care if it's noodles or rice. What does that mean? Is it possible to form a natural whole with the following meaning: "If it's a delicious dish, it's OK" and the previous meaning? Noodles and rice, in the eyes of the Chinese people belong to the rice, rice and food are two different concepts, either consistent, talk about rice, or before and after the formation of contrast. I don't care if I have rice or not, I just want some food. So, what are you trying to say?

我这辈子可能就没怎么用过这个短语...

Bolton： 语言不是文字游戏，简单组合的在一起，符全语法就完了。”我不管有没有面条或者米饭“表达的是什么意思？那么接下来的”如果是好吃的菜都可以啊“和前面的话的意思可能形成自然的整体吗？面条和米饭，在中国人眼里属于饭，饭和菜是两个不同的概念，要么前后要一致，谈饭就都谈饭，要么就前后形成对比。比如说成：不管有没有饭，有菜就行。所以，你到底想要表达什么呢？