Search from various English teachers...
China flagnowt000
"will" vs "would" A: What's Ted doing? B: (thinking..) He will be jogging in the park. A: What's Ted doing? B: (thinking..) He would be jogging in the park. Do both sound natural? Any difference in meaning?

Answers · 3

0
The correct way to say it is 'He is jogging in the park.' 'is' makes it present tense so he jogging right now He will be jogging in the park. - This is future tense so it means he will be jogging in the park later but not necessary now. He would be jogging in the park. - This means normally Ted would be jogging in the park but he is not. It can also mean Ted habitually jogs in the park. Bonus: He should be jogging in the park. - This means you expect that he is jogging in the park but you don't know for sure. This is kinda a weird usage of 'should' but its used pretty often like this.
0
"Ted is probably jogging in the park" sounds the most natural to me.

Still haven’t found your answers?

Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!

Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!

Start Learning Today