I believe that not all people are born leaders, but anybody can(could) become a leader. Certainly, it is very important to have motivation. We can inherit intellectual, emotional, or even physical qualities, which can help us to become a leader, but it's impossible to be born as a real leader, initially . People become leaders step-by-step. Today there are some training courses that help people to develop their leadership skills and gain neсessary knowledge​, but the most important thing is persistence and desire to change yourself; so that men can become leaders more quickly. We/One could suggest that it is easier to become a leader for people who are confident, clever, sociable, and purposeful. Corrections *anybody (vs. everybody -- in context) *can (vs. cam) *comma after Certainly *comma before "which can help..." *comma before initially (although, that is a long sentence) *courses that *gain necessary knowledge (vs. get some...) *Only sounds awkward, so I would delete to sound more natural *more quickly --- it's not wrong, but the word quicker would sound okay, also *We could suggest or One can suggest. Choose (vs. I can say) * for people (remove the comma) *I would add an "Oxford comma" to the series of adjectives

I believe that not all people are born leaders,but everybody can become a leader. Certainly it is very important to have motivation. We can inherit intellectual, emotional or even physical qualities which can help us to become a leader,but it is impossible to be born as a true leader. People become leaders step-by-step. Today there are some training courses which help people to develop their leadership skills, and get some neсessary knowledge​-- but the most important thing is persistence and desire to change yourself. Men can become leaders more quickly. I can say that it is easier to become a leader for people who are confident,clever, sociable and purposeful. Most of the changes are minor. I was not sure what you wanted to say in the sentence about men becoming leaders. I may have guessed incorrectly on that. I am also a little puzzled on how what you wrote is in disagreement with the title of your question. I am guessing the title was an assignment to you, which you disagreed with (if so, I agree with what you wrote).

Next time you should post it in the notes section. It is easier for me to correct there and see the changes. As you can see, the other corrections you have do now show what the changes are easily. It would be very difficult for you to learn. If you post your entry there and notify me with the link included, I shall be most happy to help you.

Warning: nothing related to the English language, just my thoughts in what follows. A world with too many (or with unfair) leaders would me a nightmare in my opinion. Being a leader does not imply being 'fair' and having a great sense of justice, this is a tragic fact about the human condition. Being a leader does not even automatically imply knowing a secure path, but it implies making the followers believe that a secure and path leading to good results is set in advance; the history of the previous century is full of examples of such giant lies.