I would have loved to have been part of that.
Can it be " I would love to be part of that "?
Why have to use the "have"twice ?
Here i attach the context :
How much did you have to do with writing that opening tonight?
It was something Will wanted to do.
He passed it around.
I would have loved to have been part of that.
I could have done the show you guys want to do.
I'm equipped for that.
Search from various English teachers...
Answers · 2
0
I'm no native speaker, so I'm waiting to be corrected.
I think "I would have loved to have been part of that." refers to a situation that has already passed, so you have to use a tense of the past. It's not possible to be part of it anymore, because it's over.
I'm not quite sure why the second "have (been)" is necessary, I would have used "to be" here.
"I would love to be part of that" refers to a pesent situation or to one that's coming soon, so it's still possible to be part of it. Hence you use a tense of the present.
Did I get that right or is it complete rubbish?
0
kim,
-I would love to be part of that.
The present conditional refers to the present or the future.
-I would love to have been part of that
With the past participle (have been) it is a present regret about a past event.
-I would have loved to be part of that.
The past conditioanl refers to a past regret about something that happened in the past.
-I would have loved to have been part of that.
A past regret about something that happened before in the past.
-----
On opening night (in the past) I would have loved to have been part of the writing (writing that was done before opening night).
Still haven’t found your answers?
Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
