Search from various English teachers...
Indonesia flagNurmala
using "due to" Is "due to" the same with "because of"? Can "due to" and "because of" be used interchangeably? I always found this "due to" in the text = -It was due to the busy nature of my work -It was due to my job -No one is turned away due to their financial circumstances Can I change = It was due to my job -------> It was because of my job ???

Answers · 3

1
The cancellation was due to rain It was cancelled because of rain. Yes its the same but you should use “due to” only as an adjective, usually following the verb to be
0
In common usage, Keith is correct, but the grammar nazis would say that "due to" is an adjective and "because of" is an adverb. There's a good tool to help tell the difference: substitute "caused by" for "due to" and if the result does not make sense, then "because of" is more correct.
0
Yes

Still haven’t found your answers?

Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!

Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!

Start Learning Today