Whether The Rules And Laws Is Essencial
Society is based on rules and laws that regulate individuals' behaviours. Although strict rules and laws are helpful to control crime, I would argue that they could also be too strict and restrict individuals and industries.
Rules and laws regulate individual behaviours in almost every aspect of life. For instance, the traffic rules prevent plenty of accidents from occuring, which can save people's lives. Also, some laws that restrict the use of guns protect people from being hurt by terrorists and other offenders. If there were no rules or laws, the traffic jams, gun shootings, as well as some injuries would occur, which certainly brought individuals into trouble.
Rules and laws also provide steady growth of the economy. Laws that prompt patents support rapid growth of some state-of-the-art industries. For example, China has enforced a law that declined the tax on artificial intelligence recently, which boosted Chinese artificial intelligence. If there was no law to protect the new industry, the development of artificial intelligence in China would still be at a sluggish pace.
In my view, the rules and laws benefit individuals and society to some extent. However, it brings many strict disciplines that restrict individuals and the economy. The laws that prevent people from accessing foreign websites contribute to the limitation of domestic academy to develop, since many websites such as Google Scholar, post countless extraordinary research papers which are available to the users. Meanwhile, the import restriction raised the problem that people are unable to purchase foreign goods, which may cause some domestic producers to have a monopoly.
To summarise, it is rational to argue that the rules and laws regulate individuals' behaviours. However, if the government wants to not only stimulate individuals' creativity, but also avoid monopoly of some companies, it should loosen the restrictions.
[This is my 1st IELTS wrting practice, I would appreciate it if you could give a hand to me to make some corrections.] :)
Thanks for Kiya and Mimi's help, I polished my first version. I learnt that when talking about laws and rules that are currently in existence, I should use present tense instead.
Search from various English teachers...
Corrections · 5
1
Whether The Rules And Laws Is are Essencial Essential
The society is based on rules and laws that regulated individuals' behaviours. Although strict rules and laws are helpful to control crime commitment, I would argue that the rules and laws could be too strict to restrict individuals and industries.The rules and laws regulated individuals' behaviours in almost every aspect of life. The traffic rules prevent plenty of accidents from occurring, for instance, which save people's life lives in another way. Also, some laws such as the restriction on guns protect people from being hurt by terrorists and some offenders. If there is were no rules or laws, the traffic jams, gun shootings, as well as some hurting injuries would occur, which certainly brought individuals into trouble. (it is unclear to me what you were trying to say here?)
The rules and laws also provide steady growth of the economy. Laws that prompt patents supported rapid growth of some state-of-the-art industries to grow rapidly. For example, China has enforced a law that declined the tax on artificial intelligence, which boosted Chinese artificial intelligence. If there is was no law to protect the new industry, the development of artificial intelligence in China would still be at a sluggish pace.
In my view, the rules and laws benefit individuals and society to some extent. However, it brought brings many strict disciplines that restrict individuals and the economy. The laws that prevent people from accessing foreign websites contributed to the limitation of domestic academy to develop, since many websites such as Google Scholar, where posted countless extraordinary research papers which is are available to the users. In the mMeanwhile, the import restriction raised the problem that people are unable to purchase foreign goods, which may cause some domestic producers to have a monopoly.
To summarise, it is rational to argue that the rules and laws regulate individuals' behaviours. However, if the government wants to not only stimulate individuals' creativity, but also to avoid monopoly of some companies, it should loosen the restrictions and support more.
[This is my 1st IELTS wrting practice, I would appreciate it if you could give a hand to me to make some corrections.] :)
Good job! One suggestion is that when you are talking about the laws, you should use the present tense because the laws are currently in existence.
1
Are Rules And Laws Essential?
The society is based on rules and laws that regulate an individual's behavior. Although strict rules and laws are helpful to control crime, I would argue that they could also be too strict and restrict individuals and industries.Rules and laws regulate individual behaviors in almost every aspect of life. For instance, traffic rules prevent many accidents from occurring, which can save people's lives. Also, some laws that restrict the use of guns, protect people from being hurt by terrorists and other offenders. If there were no rules or laws, (....end of review note: I'm sorry that I didn't have the opportunity to review more, but I hope it was helpful....)
Want to progress faster?
Join this learning community and try out free exercises!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
