Please, correct my grammar! The reading and the lecture are both about space industry privatization. The author of the reading believes that private space tourism will benefit both science and people. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. He thinks that private space tourism will not have any positive effects neither on public nor on the scientific progress. First of all, the author of the reading points out that private space tourism will make travelling to space much cheaper, thus enhancing space exploration. This point is challenged by the lector. He says that private space tourism will be just as expensive because of the further necessity to develop space traffic control system and to make costly tests of the new spaceship models. Secondly, it is stated in the reading passage that private space tourism will benefit science as the industry will provide more workplaces for scientists. The lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggests that private space industry will impact on the scientific research in a harmful way because employees will only do what is profitable for companies-employers. Lastly, the reading passage states that the privatization of the space industry will lessen tax burden as the whole industry will be based on the money paid for the tickets. The lecturer, on the other hand, points that the taxes will remain just as high as space tourism industry will demand building space stations and airports, expenses on which private investors will not manage to cover.