Corrections · 1
COMMENT
As a brief summary,
you have been trying to suggest a solution to tackle with the problem associated with poor (or ultra poor) Colombian, which are indicated in the previous studies.
The reasons you picked up are unemployment, displacement and inequality in the Colombia. In particular, you have pointed out the opportunity difference between the rich and the poor, with one example safe birth control. In addition, you have mentioned the luck of government supports to farmers, craftmen and small companies.
The first solution is education policies to improve education quality in Colombia. With a example of Finland, you suggest that a fair opportunity to learn might reduce inequality.
---
As my comment for the first solution part,
does this Finland evidence really support your statement? I think that it support the existence of some policies but doesn't support the causal impact of an education policy on the poor. It might be helpful to find an another evidence or to describe a story directly related to the causal relationship for reducing the poor people ratio if your genuine interest comes from it.
Good work by the way, take care!
Want to progress faster?
Join this learning community and try out free exercises!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
