विश्वास ही नहीं हो रहा कि ये आप ने लिखा है। अगर ये सब आप ने बिना किसी सहायता के लिखा है, तो आप निश्चित रूप से देवनागरी लिपि लिखने वाले बन गए है, रही बात भाषा की तो उसका तो कोई अंत नहीं है। अगर लिखे हुए को धारा परवाह बोल भी लेते है, तो एक आम भारतीय के समतुल्य हैं। साहित्य की विधाओं के बारे में तो आम भारतीय भी नहीं जानते।

आपके रूपक सटीक हैं, और आपकी भाषा ज्ञान अब तक मूल्यांकन के लिए संतोषजनक स्तर पर आ चुकी है। दुर्भाग्य से मुझे IELTS या TOEFL की तरह किसी परीक्षा के बारे पता नहीं है जो आधिकारिक तौर पर किसी के हिंदी ज्ञान का स्तर निर्णय कर सके। मगर फिर भी मैं समझता हूँ कि निरंतर अभ्यास से आपकी हिंदी भविष्य में भी उन्नत होती रहेगी। It is rather interesting that perhaps no native Hindi speaker actually speaks the language the way I have written it here. The average educated urban Indian uses very many English loanwords in day to day speech even when their direct Hindi equivalents are available, to the extent that the language has started getting called "Hinglish". On the other hand, the average uneducated speaker simply does not have that kind of formal vocabulary. The language purists here argue (like anywhere else in the world) that this is corrupting the language beyond recognition, but that has no linguistic basis whatsoever. So long as the root nouns, verbs and structures remain the same, the language remains distinctively what it always was - in this case, Hindi - despite any number of foreign loanwords as enhanced vocabulary. The best example of this is English itself, which very much remains English despite having just about 1% of its root Anglo Saxon words still in active use. However, that 1% is still used around 60% of the time in speech and writing, and the structure and grammar also remains firmly English. The huge number of Norman, French, Scandinavian, Latin, Greek, Arabic, Hindustani and even Chinese loanwords that are now standard dictionary entries have made the language no less English than it always was.