In the last twenty years, the Internet has become an integral part of our lives, providing an almost unlimited access to information of all sorts. However, the impact of the digital world on peoples' lives, the extent of harm it causes in particular, remains a point of controversy. While some believe the World Wide Web should be scrubbed clean of the ideas and subjects which “contradict morality” and the strict governmental control over social networks and websites​ is quite in order, others in turn advocate for the sharing of information for free (where copyrights are ignored) and total privacy at all costs.

I'm not sure what the phrase "the strict governmental control over social networks and websites is quite in order" is supposed to mean. The last part ("is quite in order") is the phrase I'm having trouble understanding.