Essay about old workers. Please share your opinion or make correction. It is not wise for an industry to replace its experienced but old workers with new and young yet inexperienced individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? The labor force has always been a major key in a business world. Most of the people consider that it is not rational for a company to attract inexperienced fresh employees instead of old experts, what's could be unfair for the second ones. I personally absolutely agree with the given statement. Unfortunately, but the present society live in a materialistic world, where the money play the major role, what means that human and ethical feelings are moved back by businessmen due to priority for a company's profit. Thus, if the productivity will go downwards, no one will look at one's length work and its contribution for company’s life. Typically, in this case, the old worker is being replaced by the young one. It is convinced, experienced individuals of every industry should be hold as valuable assets. Especially, critical roles should not be given to inexperienced graduates rather every company have to provide a well structured programme that help to involve newbies without losing veterans. Some human resources experts support the idea of mentorship, where old advisors could share their knowledges with green hands, which, in turn, would expand their skills for updated technologies. For instance, the Japanese conception let people to work for one company during all life until the retirement age without any afraid of being fired due the age. In a nutshell, I am inclined to believe that sometimes managers make not wise decisions fire the old and experienced employees considering age as the only factor. Thus, people should find an optimal approach with solving this problem.