Consumption of animal flesh.
What if a respectable university or research institute said that the human body doesn't need animal meat to survive? Does this fact would make the consumer over? Maybe not, but people would have no reasons to continue doing so.
Would it be worthwhile to continue consuming meat just to satisfy personal taste even if it means making animals suffer? The answer depends on how much would each one to sacrifice to prevent the suffering of others.
Whoever is not willing, will surely try to find other justifications before acknowledging that "my desire exceeds my empathy for the animal".
I think the guilt or pain is the difference between satisfaction and the injury which, consciously or not, we know we cause to do so.
This may sound cruel but cruel truth is preferable to a cruel lie, because in truth we can build solutions to our iniquities.
Search from various English teachers...
Corrections · 3
0
Hello,
My name is maris, which is really nice to get on this site, I took interest in you after reading your profile at (www.italki.com). ([email protected])
I believe age and distance has nothing to do with love, so just drop me an email through my private e-mail address ([email protected]), so that we can communicate better and I send you my images.
Thank you.
maris.
0
It would be a duplication if I try to correct your essay. Bethany had done a great job. However, I would like to point out that "eating meat" means we are consuming animal meat; not human. This would be cannabalism. There is a subtle difference in the meaning of "meat" and "flesh". Also, in this context, "animal" is redundant for "eating of animal meat".
Meat Consumption of animal flesh.
What if a respectable university or research institute said that the human body doesn't need animal meat to survive? Does this fact would make the consumer over? Maybe not, but people would have no reasons to continue doing so.
Would it be worthwhile to continue consuming meat just to satisfy personal taste even if it means making animals suffer? The answer depends on how much would each one to sacrifice to prevent the suffering of others.
Whoever is not willing, will surely try to find other justifications before acknowledging that "my desire exceeds my empathy for the animal".
I think the guilt or pain is the difference between satisfaction and the injury which, consciously or not, we know we cause to do so.
This may sound cruel but cruel truth is preferable to a cruel lie, because in truth we can build solutions to our iniquities.
0
Consumption of animal flesh.
What if a respectable university or research institute said that the human body doesn't need animal meat to survive? Does Would this fact would make the consumer over change the consumer's mind? Maybe not, but people would have no reasons to continue doing so.
Would it be worthwhile to continue consuming meat just to satisfy personal taste even if it means making animals suffer? The answer depends on how much would each one would to sacrifice to prevent the suffering of others.
Whoever is not willing, will surely try to find other justifications before acknowledging that "my desire exceeds my empathy for the animal".
I think the guilt or pain is the difference between satisfaction and the injury which, consciously or not, we know we cause to do so by eating meat.
This may sound cruel but cruel truth is preferable to a cruel lie, because in truth we can build find solutions to our iniquities.
Excellent work.
Want to progress faster?
Join this learning community and try out free exercises!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
