Let's write an IELTS essay #2 Societies with a heritage in the arts have long been considered culturally sophisticated. However, the question of to what extent financial resources should be allocated for the development of the arts has always sparked heated controversy. While some commentators claim that spending money on the arts is a waste of financial resources, some argue that the arts are a vital part of the society, and as long as the money is spent in a well-planned fashion, the arts will increase the quality of life in a society. In this essay, I will argue that the government should make a good amount of expenditure on the arts not only to foster the social, but also the economic develepment of the society. To begin with, the more a society spends time on the arts, the more advanced it becomes in other areas such as science and technology. This is largely because, the arts remove the limitaions of human mind helping people imagine what has never imagined before. Leonarda Da Vinci is a famous example in that he is both an engineer and artist. He has designed a good number of flying machines, one of which is what we today call a helicopter. He also contributed vastly to the anatomy. It is therefore clear that art and science feed each other, and a development in the arts will translate into advancements in the science and technology. On the other hand, some argue that in almost every country, a good percentage of the population suffers from poverty, and spending money on the arts is not a priority for the society. Reason for this is that the money spent on the arts could be spent in a way that the government could provide shelter and food for the poor, and create job opportunities for the unemployed people. For instance, even though it has the greatest economy in the world, there is a vast number of poor people in the United States. Consequently, Spending money on the arts, while it is possible to use that money to fight with poverty seems irrational for some people. To conclude, not allocating any financial resources for the arts would deprieve the development of science and technology. Underdevelopment of science and technology will eventually hamper the economic growth. Nevertheless, spending too much money on the arts will worsen the conditions of life of the poor in the short run. Seen in this light, it is clear that government expenditure on the arts is vital for the overall development of a country as long as the money is spent in a well-planned fashion.