Search from various English teachers...
Posts
Ielts test
Some people warn that the era of the silver screen is coming to an end and that people will eventually lose interest in going to the cinema. Do you agree or disagree with this view?
In the recent years, less and less people talk about the era of sliver screen and unwilling to go to cinema. I tend to deem that the sliver screen era will be replaced in the near future. There are several factors contribute to this trend.
To begin with, people now have much more ways of relaxing themselves. They do not have to drive to the cinema in a warm Satuday afternoon with wife and children. Instead, they are preferable to stay at home watching TV or reading kinds of magazines. Also they have chance to watch a football ball match or have afternoon tea with fellows.
Second, thank to the development of science and technique, an increasing numbers people are turning to modern technique. They would prefer to listen to the music from Ipod touch of seeing movies from Ipad, and even use Facetime to "see" relatives and friends from other continents. All of these can not be taken into consideration in the past. Thus a saying "Let's going to cinema" seems to be out-of-date.
Third, with less and less people stick to the sliver screen, scientists and movie makers find it needless to invest in this field. For one thing, the income they make in sliver screen cannot afford the cost they put into. For the other thing, they hold the invest in public media and modern technique are suitable for people's interest.
In conclusion, many factors will lead to the disappearance of sliver screen era. It may be taken place of in the near future.
0
0
Ielts test
The costs of medical health care are increasing all the time. Governments are finding it difficult to balance the health care budget.
Should citizens be totally responsible for their own health costs and take out private health insurance, or is it better to have a comprehensive health care system which provides free health services for all? Discuss.
Nowadays, with the increasing numbers of population and the development of health facilities, governments are paying more and more in the field of public health. Should individuals be totally or partly responsible for their own health and take place of the duty of government in this field?
Some people hold that governments should pay for all the cost of citizens. They explain that government tax are derive from people that should be use for people, so health care fee are deem to be a responsibility for governments. What's more, many families cannot afford health cost, especially for those who get serious illness; hence they regard government as harbor. Without government support, some of them have to leave hospital and wait for death.
Also some people think health care should be paid by residents, rather than government and government budget need to be use in more significant issues, such as infrastructure and education. For example, in china, infrastructures occupy the most percentage of financial budgets, while a little percent of fund are put into medical treatment and health.
In my personal opinion, both governments and individuals can share the cost of health care. Since governments are responsible for its peoples, including the health of its people, and individuals are responsible for their own health. For those people who can afford their health cost, they may pay for their own fee; and for most citizens who are still in relative poor position, governments are bound to give a hand.
0
0
寻找新西兰的朋友
大学读完以后想去新西兰继续读研究生，不知道这个网站上有没有当地的朋友或者在中国留学的的新西兰学生啊？
1
0
First notebook entry: Introducing myself
My name is Ma LIn, a boy of 20 years old, coming from Hang Zhou, China. Now I am an English major junior student. This is the first time I using this approch improving English language learnng. I would like to make friends with all of you and may you good luck every day.
2
0
