Search from various English teachers...
Posts
~에/에서 봤다
If I have to say "I saw that person behind the tree" --> "나는 그 사람을 나무 뒤에(서?) 봤어요" I am a bit confused if I should use 에 or 에서. What I mean is that "그 사람이 나무 뒤에 있다" so should I use "에" because I want to comunicate his existing/standing position? Or should I use 에서 because 에서 is used with 동사 like 보다?
4
0
~기 or (으)ㅁ used with ~고?
부활절 연휴 때 고향에 돌아가기, 많이 먹기.
부활절 연휴 때 고향에 돌아가고 많이 먹기.
지난 주 주말에 집에 있음, 만화를 읽음, 공부를 함.
지난 주 주말에 집에 있고 만화를 읽고 공부를 함.
I wonder if is okay to use ~고 ~고 ~고 and only the ending verb nominalized with 기/음, or 그리고 with the nominalized verbs. Is some of these sentences wrong?
1
0
Why is this phrase wrong?
나는 자주 밥을 먹었을 때 책을 읽었어요.
한국어 선생님께서는 said this this frase is wrong, she talked about something concerning "자주" could you please explain me why?
6
0
(으)시 + 아/어야 되다
가세요 --> 가세야 되다 or 가셔야 되다?
2
0
예를 들어 / 예를 들어서
안녕하세요? Which is the difference between 예를 들어 and 예를 들어서?
These mean "for example", right?
3
0
더 같아요 (?)
저는 사진에서 뚱뚱한 사람 더 같아요.
뚱뚱하는 것 더 같아요.
어떻게 말 수 있어요? How can I say it? Can I use one of the two sentences I wrote above?
"I look fatter in the photos."
2
0
기분이 더럽다 meaning
기분이 더럽다, what does it means?
I've found the translation: to feel dirty. But I didn't understand the meaning of this expression. If you please, would you give me an example where the situation of use is explained? Thank you so much! I hope this is not a swear word ㅜㅜ, in case I apologize.
2
1
듣다 + (으)ㄹ까요 ?
듣을까요?
들을까요?
어느 맞아요?
5
0
이다 + (으)시 + ㅂ니다
I had undrestood that 이다 can become
이세요 if there is a patchim at the ending of the verb stem
세요 if there is not a patchim
But how about the formal version? I understood that the formal version just uses 이십니다, indipendently from the patchim is that right?
Thank you for your time!
2
0
