Teenagers should be allowed to read whatever books they like. There are people who think that teenagers should choose books themselves. Other people are convinced that children must read the "correct" books, which are censored. The first opinion looks like something totalitarian. Teenagers, and are not only they, must read books, which they are wanted to read. Because if you will read the bad book, by your opinion, you will not fully enjoy reading. Moreover, every person have differents books which they are loved, because all people different in their preferences. As to another opinion, it is more democratic. When you read a good book, that you have chosen yourself, you feel that exerything was done right. You can read books that suit you and you can improve yourself. For example, teenagers like read books like "Harry Potter", because they really loved their and they can learn what is kind, friendship, brave, love e.t.c. But i can not agree with both statement. I think that if teenagers will read books without censor, they can found something is not good for them. Children usually do not look on age limit, so the chance that they will choose a book not for them is raised. On the other hand, if parents will watch for his children and control what they read, it will be useful for both sides. Children will read good books with their age-limit. I believe that children should not be allowed to read all books that they like because some of them are dangerous for readers.