This picture shows the percentage of people living in three types of dwellings in Australia The table below tells people scales of people living in different kinds of dwelling in Australia during 2001 and 2006. Most of people lived iin house wherever they were in three of these places both in 20001 and 2006. but among these locations, Tasmania had the largest proportions of people lived in houses, which was 88% in 2001 and 86% in 2006. The Northern Territory ranked in the second place, which had 67% and 65% of people lived in house respectively to 2001 and 2006. Victoria, where lowest proportion of citizens chose to live in house, only had 76% of people both in 2001 and 2006. However, Victoria had the most preferred semi-detached dwellings, which was 12% in 2001 and 13% in 2006. The proportion of living in semi-detached grew from 9% to 10% from 2001 to 2006. Compared to them, Tasmania had the lowest scale, which was just 4% both in 2001 and 2006. Not many people in these three areas lived in flats or apartments. Both the Northern Territory and Tasmania just had less than 10% of people living in flat and apartment. Even Victoria had only 11% of people in 2001 and 12% of people in 2006 living in these places. Despite of dwellings listed above, very small percentage of people lived in other places both in Victoria and Tasmania. Compared to only 1%, the scale of people living in other places reached the highest amount of 12% in 2001 and 11% in 2006, which was astonishing.

Thw chart below shows the health spending among five different countries in 2002 From the graph below, we can get the idea about different health spending proportions of GDP in different countries in 2002. Among those five countries, USA had the highest total spending proportion, which was 14% in 2002. Germany ranked in the second place, whose health spending took 12% proportion of GDP. France and Italy took the third and forth places, having 11% and 9% proportion respectively. Finally, Japan had the lowest scale, which was only 8% in the whole GDP. Respectively, American government also paid the largest attention to public health. In 2002, America’s public health spending reached 10% among the GDP. Germany also stressed public health a lot, which used 9% of GDP in public health spending. Compared to Germany and USA, France and Italy did not have such a large amount public health spending in GDP. Meanwhile, Japan had the lowest proportion in public health spending, which was 2% in 2002. Though France had higher proportion than Japan, both in total health spending and public health spending, its private health spending was as low as Japan’s, which was only 2% of total GDP. Compared with them, Italy took higher amount of GDP, which was 3%. At the same time, citizen lived in Germany did not pay the same attention to health spending as their government did. In fact, private spending only took nearly 4% of GDP in Germany. However, American people stressed their health a lot. American private health spending reached an amazing important position of 10% in 2002, which was even higher than American public health spending.

How to improve my IELTS listening!!!! I have trouble with my IELTS listening. I cannnot understand what those people in listening part talking about. I do not know which word they are saying. I sometimes totally misunderstood them. How can I improve my listening? In fact, I am very confused about that. Because I have nearly no trouble in reading. I also good at writing and speaking. So how can I improve my listening based on this situation? Thanks in advance for any reply!

The table below shows the income and expenditure of Harckley Hall in three years We can get the information about Harckley Hall’s profit and loss in three years from the table below. Among the income of Harckley Hall, we can find income of hiring room was the majority, which took the largest proportion in three years. Harckley Hall could get more than 30,000 each year in hiring room. On the contrast, income of cafe was always the smallest part in total income. Harckley Hall could only receive 3,000, 4,000 and 6,000 which were respective to year one, two and three. Compared to those two incomes, funding from local council and from other bodies were mediate and approximate. They often fluctuated around 20,000 in these three years. Above these items, total income was the largest in year two, which was 78,000. However, the expenditure in year two also reached the highest amount of 74,000. As a result, the profit in year two was just 4,000. Though the income was not as high as 78,000 in year one, Harckley Hall’s expenditure was the lowest in three years. So the profit of year one was the highest 9,000. And conspicuously, the profit of year three was undoubtedly the lowest.

What does "address" mean? Dobb-Frank Act which was designed to address the many issues that led to the crisis. What does "address" mean? Thanks in advance for any reply. (Sentence comes from Financial Times, Junes 14th, 2017)

What does this sentence mean? New angles catch the light on Japan's stressed workers and Amarica's poor. In the sentence above, what does"catch the light on" mean? Thanks in advance for any reply! (This sentence comes from Financial Times, June 14th, 2017.)

difference of two words What's the difference between jewelry and jewel? Thanks in advance for any reply!

Would you please explain a sentence for me? Please explain a sentence for me. My coach does not stretch me enough. Can anybody explain it for me? Thanks a lot!

Something about IELTS writing I cannot finish English writing very quickly. The eassies I wrote are always needed to be revised at least once. Nevertheless, grammar mistakes and improper discriptions would exist in my essay. So what should I do to improve this situation? Thanks in advance for any replier!