Donald Trump Letter Dear Nataly I’m just writing to let you know that I’m very interested in make a Mater of Engineering in Canada. I was researching in many universities there in Edmonton and finally I found a stunning program of Non-Renewable Energies offered by the University of Alberta. I’m convinced that my CV could match perfectly with the required profile by the university. I have worked about six years designing machinery for the oil and gas industry. Furthermore, my previous studies in Mechanical Engineering and Solar Energy could represent an impresing background for the tutors in charge of the selection of the upcoming students. For all these reasons, I peg you please to assist me gathering specific and detailed information about the staff, syllabus, researching groups, and further information for me to assess and finally decide if that program fulfill my expectations. I really appreciate your help. Looking forward to hearing from you soon All the best Donald Trump

Letter to Ask for a Promotion Dear Mr Jackson I am writing this letter in order to pustulate myself as a Supervisor for the Manufacturing and production Department. This vacancy is available since the last days of march of the current year. I kindly claim you to consider my CV for this role because I have deep theoretical and practical knowledge about the whole process of production we deal with. Furthermore, I have detected several failures inside the department but I have as well many interesting propossals that can be implemented to solve these issues. To name a specific problem, it is notorious that we are having delays with the orders. I am sure that the root problem is the lack of planning and organisation in the warehouse. However it is possible to improve the performance of the employees by clearly stating functions of each of them, modifying the actual purchasing terms we have and other sort of measures to assure the compliance of timeframes for each project. As the example given before, I can suggest and lead many solutions and changes that can be applied in this area in order to reduce costs and delivery times, and be more competitive. I look forward to hearing some news about this request. Your faithfully Albert Tisdley

IELTS Essay - Cooking teaching in schools. Agree or not? It is well known that topics like cooking or financial education to name a few are useful to survive and be succesful in society nowadays. Nevertheless, other subjects related with science, arts and language, between others, play an important role as well. It is agreed that topics that involved applied sciences and arts must be taught at school, instead of other secondary subjects such as cooking. These crafts can be well-learned at home, This essay will discuse this point of view. Primarily, as arts in kitchen, topics like fynancial training, good manners and teology can be learned by young people at home. Tese are important subjects and parents must be responsible to educate children on these topics in order to give them tools to face their upcoming lives in community. More than “subjects”, these topics represent values. For instance, teology and religion was compulsory taught in Colombia 15 to 20 years ago. However, this topic was abolished from the primary and secondary school programs because some parents believed that this topic was intended against their principles. On the other hand, topics related with science and technology should be strongly implemented and reinforced in schools. Nowadays, cutting edge technology is surrounding us and applied science is transforming our world everywhere. Recent studies conducted by the MIT shows that the expected growth in robotics and computational sciences students will be around 200% on the next decade. Therefore, it is required that education in schools advance across the same path as mankind does. To conclude, crafts like kitchen and others related should be excluded from schools syllabus. The evolution of humans and technology require that schools and educational organizations focus education in science and technology, facing the new era of knowledge.

Inventors are not as important to society as doctors. agree or disagree? Some people believe that inventors are more relevant in society than doctors. It is not convenient to compare these professions. However, with the premise that preservation of life is the main purpose of each person on earth, it is agreed that doctors play a more relevant role compared with scientist, as will be discussed in this essay. Initially, work of researchers is intended to develop science and technology and enlarge the field of knowledge, regardless humanity well-being. Day by day, innovations are leaded to give more comfort to individuals, instead of the developing of inventions that promote healthy habits against sedentism. For instance, recent studies conducted by the University of Cambridge have revealed that only the 7% of registered researchers in the United States are working in fields of Medicine and Health. The rest are spread in subjects like Computational Sciences, Astronomy, Astrology and Renewable and Alternative Sources of Energy, between others. On the other hand, doctors and all the individuals working with healthcare save thousands of lives every day. No matter the circumstances such as war conditions, infectious environments, racism, poverty or locative difficulties, they are always contributing to cure and preserve life as a main principle. However, other fields of knowledge follow other primordial ideals. For example, the main goal of scientist that invented the hydrogen bomb was to develop a massive destruction weapon to cause the highest damage, regardless of future of human existence on earth; something totally opposed to the main principles of medical mission. To conclude, both inventors and doctors play important roles into communities. Nevertheless, humanity well-being and existence of mankind on earth should be the main objective to pursuit. Thus, all topics related with public health and preservation of life are more relevant that those about technological inventions.

Essay about Old People Care Once kids leave home, parents must take care of themselves. Sometimes sons help them, but in other occasions, they left them alone and government must bring them the care and attentions they need. Based on this background, I am convinced that sons must always be in charge of their parents if they need special attention, with no exceptions. For instance, my grandmother was poor but along all her life, she worked to keep home and her children safe. Passing the years, one by one were leaving home. With time, she got alone, living by her own means. Afterwards, she got sick and in spite of she was living alone, all her sons carried on with the expenses of her medical treatment and they were beside her until she died. She rested in peace because her sons never let her alone when she needed them. She felt her efforts of young mother were compensated. They could leave her alone because nobody could force them to help her, but deep feelings like love and gratitude made them to be always with her in those instances. By means of this example I try to show that sons should ever take care of their parents. It does not mean that they have to live by them, at the same place. Nevertheless, in ancient ages, old people need to be assisted like children and we must to return the favor to them, not for obligation, but as a proof of true love. Only in cases of complete abandon or people without sons, government should take care of old-aged persons. To summarize, it is a fact that life is a cycle. Now we are young, but tomorrow will be ancient. Therefore, we should take care of our relatives in old age because in the past they gave to us the best and it would be a shame that we forgive them in the end. Beyond of money issues, love and gratitude to them must prevail.

Essay Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child’s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school. As an instinct, parents are always looking the best for their children, and the educational issues are not the exception. Some of them believe that a personalized education at home is the best path to achieve this goal. The rest thinks that being immerse into a school is the healthiest way to educate their children and I feel identified with them. First of all, the education as a whole is not only related with learning of theories, principles or facts. The real meaning of education transcends these concepts. For instance, sharing with other kids at the school children learns how to make part into a community, they realize as well the value of friendship and how helpful is team-working. Moreover, being immerse into a group of people, kids improve their communication skills. Giving a point of view about a specific issue or just talking with their classmates about homework, they learn how to express their ideas clearly and correctly and in the same manner, they learn to listen and keep in mind other points of view. Finally, world education models are designed to be imparted in mass using classrooms, virtual spaces, conferences, seminars, among others, and people must be formed since children to be educated under these parameters. If you do not get involved into groups since young, probably you will have many troubles when you reach the university and even worst, in daily life. In conclusion, I strongly believe that children must be educated inside a school environment in order to learn about science, language and culture but over all, how to life into a society in which they will be immersed the rest of their existence.