Search from various English teachers...
Posts
¿Cómo podría decir "Lo que todavía tengo dando vueltas en la cabeza"? De menos a más idiomático:
1. What I'm still thinking about is...
2. What's still on my mind is...
3. But still bouncing around in my head is...
0
0
Today I learned "Muster Point" (an emergency assembly point) and "EPIRB" (emergency position-indicating radio beacon) while on a tour to the Great Barrier Reef
2
0
¡Aprendé lo que significa ser de la ciudad de La Plata, Argentina!
This content has been deleted.
0
0
Me: Do we say "different to" and "different from"?
GG: Both "different to" and "different from" are correct, but there are regional preferences. "Different from" is the more common usage in American English and is considered the standard form by many style guides. "Different to" is more common in British English, but it's also used in American English. Ultimately, the choice between the two often depends on personal preference and the specific context. If you're unsure, "different from" is generally a safe bet.
0
0
I asked GG to explain the difference between these words: capacity, ability, and capability. This is what it said:
1) Capacity generally refers to the maximum amount or number something can hold or contain. It's often associated with physical or mental limitations. Example:
🗣 The stadium has a capacity of 50,000 people.
2) Ability is the power or skill to do something. It's often related to personal qualities or talents. Example:
🗣 She has the ability to learn languages quickly.
3) Capability is the quality of being able to do something. It's often used in a more formal or technical context. Example:
🗣 The new software has the capability to analyze large datasets.
Key Differences:
1) Capacity focuses on quantity or limit.
2) Ability emphasizes personal skills or talents.
3) Capability highlights the potential or potential for action.
In summary:
1) Capacity is about how much you can hold or do.
2) Ability is about what you can do.
3) Capability is about your potential to do something.
0
1
Me: We talk about power cuts, not "electricity cuts", right?
GG: Yes, that's correct. We typically refer to interruptions in the electrical supply as "power cuts" or "blackouts." These terms emphasize the loss of power, which is often the primary concern during such outages.
An outage is a period when a service, such as electricity, is not available:
🗣 The radio news reported power outages affecting 50 homes.
A blackout is a time when all lights must be hidden by law, or when there is no light or power because of an electricity failure:
🗣 wartime blackouts
🗣 Power lines were blown down and we had a blackout of several hours.
0
0
⚡️ "To" or "in order to"?
#DoubtsForLater
My students often bring up questions that I can't answer fully at the moment, so I save them and do research later. We don't know everything, do we?
"To" and "in order to" are both used to express purpose or intention, but they have slightly different nuances:
"To" is the most common way to express purpose or intention. It's simple and direct. Example:
🗣 I went to the store to buy milk.
"In order to" is a more formal and emphatic way to express purpose or intention. It emphasizes the importance or necessity of the action. Example:
🗣 In order to succeed, you need to work hard.
In most cases, you can use either "to" or "in order to" and the meaning will be the same. However, "in order to" can be more appropriate in formal writing or when you want to emphasize the purpose of an action.
0
0
1) Co-worker: This is a more general term that simply refers to someone who works in the same place as you. It doesn't necessarily imply a close working relationship, but it can be used to describe anyone who shares your workplace.
2) Workmate: This term is similar to "co-worker," but it often suggests a more informal or friendly relationship. It's a term that might be used more commonly in casual settings or among younger people.
3) Partner: This term typically implies a closer working relationship, often involving shared responsibilities and a sense of mutual partnership. It might be used in a business context, where two people work together to run a company, or in a more casual setting, like a team project.
4) Colleague: This term is a bit more formal than "co-worker" or "workmate." It suggests a professional relationship, often involving people who work in the same field or industry. It's a term that might be used in academic or corporate settings.
In English-speaking countries like Australia, people generally associate "partner" more with romantic relationships. While it can be used to refer to a business partner or a teammate, the primary connotation is romantic.
If you want to refer to a business partner or a teammate in a more formal context, it's often more specific to use terms like "business partner," "colleague," or "teammate."
0
1
⚡️ "Once a week" or "once per week"?
#DoubtsForLater
My students often bring up questions that I can't answer fully at the moment, so I save them and do research later. We don't know everything, do we?
Me: What's the difference between "once a week" and "once per week"?
GG: There's no practical difference between "once a week" and "once per week." Both phrases mean that something happens exactly one time during the week.
OK. That said... What does "per" mean? According to the Cambridge dictionary, it means "for each":
🗣 The meal will cost $20 per person.
🗣 The car was traveling at 70 miles per hour (70 mph).
🗣 There are more cafés per square mile here than anywhere else in the country.
Oh, another doubt:
Me: Can prepositions "per" and "for" be interchanged?
GG: No.
"Per" is often used to indicate a rate, frequency, or quantity per unit of something. Examples:
🗣 10 miles per hour.
🗣 Once per week.
🗣 2 dollars per gallon.
"For" is often used to indicate a duration, purpose, or recipient. Examples:
🗣 Wait for me.
🗣 A gift for you.
🗣 Work for a company.
0
0
⚡️ "Jump into/onto..."?
#DoubtsForLater
My students often bring up questions that I can't answer fully at the moment, so I save them and do research later.
---
Me: When I talk to my students before the lesson, I tell them something like 🗣 "Jump into/onto Zoom!" (as in the platform Zoom), 🗣 "Come onto/into Zoom", or 🗣 "I'm on/in Zoom". Are these correct or natural?
GG: These expressions are all correct and natural ways to say 🗣 "Join me on Zoom." They are informal and conversational, which is appropriate for talking to students. Here are some other options you could use:
🗣 "Meet me on Zoom."
🗣 "Let's get on Zoom."
🗣 "I'll be waiting for you on Zoom."
Me: So we don't really say "onto" or "into". Just "get on".
GG: You're absolutely right! "Get on" is the most common and natural way to say it in this context. While "onto" and "into" can technically be used, they're less common and might sound a bit odd in this specific situation. So, 🗣 "Jump on Zoom!" or 🗣 "Get on Zoom!" are the best options.
---
After that initial research using Google Gemini (GG), I looked up the expressions in the dictionary.
Merriam-Webster defines "jump in" as "to join a conversation", e.g. 🗣 "Jump in if you have any questions," whereas Cambridge defines it as "to suddenly become involved in a situation or discussion": e.g. 🗣 "Investors said they wouldn't be surprised if some companies jumped in to borrow in case rates rise further."
---
Regardless of all that, I like saying things like "Jump on Zoom" or even "Come on Zoom," because I like to think of my students as jumping into action and as coming into my "office."
0
0
Show more
