Search from various English teachers...
Posts
Government should support Public transporting.
Transportaion is a very important aspect in each country. I believe government has to spend more money in the public transportation for several important reasons. Supporting public transportation will give society more actionable and convenience in the life.
First of all, using save public transportation lead people to be creative. A creativity need more save life; moreover, if we have a save public transportation that can attain our goal. For instance, prior to 2014 when I was in Philadelphia city in the United States, I used to using public transportation. The name of the company who organize public transportation in Philla is Septa. Septa has a variety of transportation ways; such as bus,train, subway and trolly. So, the governor in Philla used to support Septa to be saved for society. Actually, I didn’t face any safety issue in the Sept transportation when I was in Philla . As a result, I have been attained my goal which is getting an admission from Drexel University for M.S degree. In addition, I can find time to study well and stay in the library whiteout any concern about transportation. By the end of this point you can notice, how can save public transportation help people to achieve goals.
Second, governments must support public transportation to be helpful for all societal levels. In brief, any society has a different income. So when the government support PT all people can use it. For example, the Philadelphia Septa Trasnpotrion Company has a different price to pass card depend on your job or age. Students have a special price in the monthly pass. This cheap price can support from government. In addition, handicap persons have a unique pass card for free which is support from government, indeed. This sort of support can lead to convenience life.
In sum, I highly recommend for government to support PT as much as they can to help society in the all life aspects.
0
0
Q1 in the TOEFL
The article state that the students should take an exam at the end of the term which called ‘ standardization’’ and provide three reasons of support. However, the professor explain that is a great deal, but this not a good way to help students in improving and refutes each of author’s reasons.
First, the article state that this test ‘standardization’ statewide and nationwide and all school will follow. The lecturer refutes that when she said this is a same material. Also, this way not only will prevents teacher freedom because by this way the school tries to impose a teacher to teach limit material but also take the students' power away.
Second, the reading claims that withe this exam school become more accountable to success for students. According to the professor's opinion to this point this kind of punching for the school system and detect how much the fund will receive. In addition, this point has a negative impact on the environment.
By the last point, the reading state that this test will help the student who want help. The professor refutes this point by saying when the student doesn't pass that’s mean they need help. Furthermore, thus determine to the students who will pass for the next level or who will repeat the same level again. So, this test not very helpful for the student.
0
0
