되다 VS 하다 (non-living VS living)
여러분 안녕하세요~
Is the usage of 하다 and 되다 correct?
되다 : cake (non-living) ~ cannot make itself delicious.
하다 : "I" (living)
케잌~케익 : cake
되었다~됐다 : became
했다 : did bake, did make
1.
a) 케익이 맛있게 됐어요.
b) 제가 케익을 맛있게 했어요.
*I know I can say 케익 맛있어요.
-------------------------------------------
2. Because of (a), does this mean I can not use other 하다 based grammar with (a)? e.g.
c) 다른 케익에 비하면 이게 맛있게 됐어요. (wrong)
d) 다른 케익에 비하면 이게 맛있게 했어요. (correct)
*This is only in context of the 케익. I know I can use 되다 with people, etc.
사전에 설명해 주셔서 고마워요~
update on mistakes, sorry:
c) 다른 케익이에 비하면 이게 맛있게 됐어요. (wrong)
d) 다른 케익을에 비하면 이게 맛있게 했어요. (correct) DGL씨 도와줘서 고마워요~
Search from various English teachers...
Answers · 1
1
c) 다른 케익에 비하면 이게 맛있게 됐어요.
Actually, we use this more in practice and I'd like to consider it correct.
That's because 이게 points to the cake.
d) 다른 케익에 비하면 이게 맛있게 했어요.
And I'll take it wrong or awkward for the same reason.
The subject of the verb 했어요 is 이게 which is the cake, but not the speaker.
Therefore, the inanimate object cake doing something doesn't sound right.
if the sentence was, '다른 케익에 비해서 이걸(이것을) 맛있게 했어요.' then it would be right.
Still haven’t found your answers?
Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
